2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting time-variation in corporate bond index returns: A smooth transition regression model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of c usually falls within the 15%/85% quantiles of the historical values of s t (see [18]). …”
Section: A the Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The value of c usually falls within the 15%/85% quantiles of the historical values of s t (see [18]). …”
Section: A the Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our empirical analysis draws heavily on the rich literature in random walk and causality tests (Granger, 1969;Campbell et al, 1997). Similar to Chen and Maringer (2011), we account for nonlinearity in corporate bond index returns. Standard methods of return predictability tests are not robust to nonlinear dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is, therefore, related to Acharya et al (2010) and other studies (e.g. Amihud, 2002;de Jong and Driessen, 2004;Lin et al, 2011;Chen and Maringer, 2011) examining the relationship between market liquidity and asset realised returns. 25…”
Section: (See Panels a And B Inmentioning
confidence: 76%