2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
181
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
181
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the percentage of positive anal swabs in the cured patients was much higher than the positive pharyngeal swabs. PCR positivity of anal swabs was reported in several studies, which has led to a discussion on the possibility of fecal-oral transmission [12,13]. The reason for PCR positive anal swabs may be that the virus enters the digestive tract from the patient's mouth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, the percentage of positive anal swabs in the cured patients was much higher than the positive pharyngeal swabs. PCR positivity of anal swabs was reported in several studies, which has led to a discussion on the possibility of fecal-oral transmission [12,13]. The reason for PCR positive anal swabs may be that the virus enters the digestive tract from the patient's mouth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two consecutive negative RNA tests is recognized as one of the discharge criteria [9]. According to the report of Wu et al, the positive rate of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCT test of nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, blood, feces and anal swabs is 38.13%, 48.68%, 3.03%, 9.83% and 10.00%, respectively [21]. Xiao et al reported that 21.4% of patients presented with a positive virus RNA test again after two consecutive negative tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were collected simultaneously in our study. Some studies reported that sputum specimen has a higher viral load and should be collected if possible [23]. A recent study reported that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the self-collected saliva of 91.7% (11/12) of patients and live virus was detected in saliva, suggesting that saliva is a promising noninvasive specimen for diagnosis in patients with 2019-nCoV infection [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%