“…2 Among the various nondestructive fatigue crack detection techniques, such as piezoelectric transducer-based and laser-based ultrasonic testing (UT), [3][4][5][6][7][8] magnetic particle testing, 9 eddy current testing, 9 X-ray tomography, 10 and machinevision 11 and image processing, 12 the laser-based ultrasonic testing (LUT) technique is extensively studied because of its multiple advantages; furthermore, LUT finds its application in manufacturing, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] construction, 20,21 aviation and aeronautics, 22,23 and several other industrial fields. 13,14,24 The sensitivity of these conventional techniques, 23,[25][26][27][28][29][30] which depend on linear property modifications of ultrasonic waves, has been reported to be insufficient to detect fatigue cracks until the cracks become visibly large; 29,31 this is because the changes caused in linear ultrasonic values by these cracks are not sufficiently large to be accurately measured using conventional linear ultrasonic techniques. 29,32 On the other hand, nonlinear acoustic 8, and vibro-thermography methods [56][57][58] have been proven to potentially overcome the limitatio...…”