2018
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2017.2778423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events: Outcome of the DCASE 2016 Challenge

Abstract: Public evaluation campaigns and datasets promote\ud active development in target research areas, allowing direct\ud comparison of algorithms. The second edition of the challenge\ud on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events\ud (DCASE 2016) has offered such an opportunity for development\ud of state-of-the-art methods, and succeeded in drawing together a\ud large number of participants from academic and industrial backgrounds.\ud In this paper, we report on the tasks and outcomes of\ud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
174
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
174
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An unsupervised approach is often adopted for ADMOS systems [10][11][12][13][14][15] because it is difficult to build an extensive set of anomalous sounds in the real world. Therefore, a DNN is trained by using only given normal sound and anomalous sound is defined as "unknown" sounds, in contrast to supervised DCASE challenge tasks [21,22] for detecting "defined" anomalous sounds such as gunshots [4]. This definition results in misdetection caused by both a rare normal sound and the difference between the recording condition in training/test dataset.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unsupervised approach is often adopted for ADMOS systems [10][11][12][13][14][15] because it is difficult to build an extensive set of anomalous sounds in the real world. Therefore, a DNN is trained by using only given normal sound and anomalous sound is defined as "unknown" sounds, in contrast to supervised DCASE challenge tasks [21,22] for detecting "defined" anomalous sounds such as gunshots [4]. This definition results in misdetection caused by both a rare normal sound and the difference between the recording condition in training/test dataset.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to detect anomalies from sound by using technologies for acoustic scene classification and event detection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Remarkable advancements have been made in the classification of acoustic scenes and the detection of acoustic events, and there are many promising state-of-the-art studies in this vein [14][15][16]. It is clear that the emergence of numerous open benchmark datasets [17][18][19][20] is essential for the advancement of the research field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Core problems in the field include identifying the acoustic environment of an audio stream, this is acoustic scene classification (ASC) or sound scene recognition [2], and on detecting the sound events or sound objects within a scene, namely sound event detection (SED) [3]. ASC and SED are commonly considered as two separate tasks in understanding sound scenes, as can be demonstrated by the evolution of the field through the IEEE AASP Challenges in Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) [4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%