2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06436-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Classification of Alzheimer’s disease from cognitive impairment with resting-state fMRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large number of samples (6,028) used it also relevant when compared with similar investigations [10]. The results show that our model has outperformed other modern experiments [5][6][7]14,24,25]. A more detailed comparison with some of the most promising investigations conducted to date is made in Table 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large number of samples (6,028) used it also relevant when compared with similar investigations [10]. The results show that our model has outperformed other modern experiments [5][6][7]14,24,25]. A more detailed comparison with some of the most promising investigations conducted to date is made in Table 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This research will thoroughly analyze the full content of the MRI images and contrast them again the afore-mentioned experiments, aiming to predict up to six different stages of dementia. The objective is to use the nine best slices proposed in [10] and simultaneously apply two different approaches as suggested in [13,14]: two-dimensional multiresolution analysis (2-D MRA) in L 2 (R 2 ), aligned with SVM and convolutional neural network (CNN) [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced the feature dimension of the fMRI resting-state images. The support vector regression (SVR) method classifies AD and MCI datasets with an accuracy of 98.53% [9]. The XG-Boost classifier on the ADNI dataset achieved an accuracy of 85.92% [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of MCI vs. NC was 76.4%, which was an improvement of 4.4–5% compared to using single modality data. Buvaneswari and Gayathri (2021) combined the features extracted from DTI and fMRI into a multikernel SVM for AD classification, and the accuracy of AD vs. NC was 98.4%; however, when the two modalities were used alone for classification, the highest achieved accuracy was only 90.9%. The above research further verifies that in the classification of AD, compared with single-modal data, the use of multimodal data can obtain richer and more valuable features, and the classifier can obtain higher classification accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%