2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105422108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing

Abstract: The identification of mutations that are present in a small fraction of DNA templates is essential for progress in several areas of biomedical research. Although massively parallel sequencing instruments are in principle well suited to this task, the error rates in such instruments are generally too high to allow confident identification of rare variants. We here describe an approach that can substantially increase the sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing instruments for this purpose. The keys to this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
988
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,065 publications
(1,012 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
18
988
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Its reliability results from an overdispersed statistical model of nucleotide counts and from integrating the signals from both DNA strands. The current limit of detection is around 1/10,000 alleles, but it may be further improved by increased coverage and higher sequencing fidelity with improved biochemistry or barcoded reads 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its reliability results from an overdispersed statistical model of nucleotide counts and from integrating the signals from both DNA strands. The current limit of detection is around 1/10,000 alleles, but it may be further improved by increased coverage and higher sequencing fidelity with improved biochemistry or barcoded reads 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, advances in whole genome amplification and nextgeneration sequencing from single-cells have enabled detection of rare molecular events in clinical specimens and are also promising methods for biomarker assays. [23][24][25] Unlike conventional MethyLight PCR, the droplets in MethyLight ddPCR are cycled to endpoint and each droplet is read as positive or negative. 15 Thus, amplification efficiency is less of a concern in MethyLight ddPCR compared to conventional MethyLight PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illumina sequencing runs consistently display a base-pair error rate of 0.05 to 1%[115]. The di-base encoding used by the SOLiD machine is able to lower this error rate to about 0.075% (SOLiD application note).…”
Section: Mps Applications In Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can only be done with errors that exhibit some consistent patterns related to the library preparation and sequencing steps[116] and not feasible for errors that appear at random. Interestingly, a recent approach to the identification of rare variants utilized the PCR amplification step in the (Illumina) library preparation to identify families of templates carrying the same mutation, which then could be inferred to have been present in the original template molecule as a real mutation[115]…”
Section: Mps Applications In Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%