2019
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.10.1900147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection in the United Kingdom of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae FC428 clone, with ceftriaxone resistance and intermediate resistance to azithromycin, October to December 2018

Abstract: We describe detection in the United Kingdom (UK) of the drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae FC428 clone, with ceftriaxone resistance and intermediate azithromycin resistance. Two female patients developed infection following contact with UK-resident men from the same sexual network linked to travel to Ibiza, Spain. One case failed treatment with ceftriaxone, and azithromycin and gentamicin, before successful treatment with ertapenem. Both isolates had indistinguishable whole-genome sequences. Urgent action is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, infections might be cleared even in the case of undetected resistance, and multi-drug therapy may similarly mask novel resistance to individual drugs. For example, one of the first identified cases of infection with N. gonorrhoeae with ceftriaxone resistance and intermediate azithromycin resistance in the UK was identified as NAAT-negative two weeks after treatment with ceftriaxone and azithromycin ( 14 ). Thus, while continued collection of clinical outcome data is crucial to defining the relationship between phenotypic susceptibility test results and expected treatment outcome, surveillance programs designed to regularly sample a sufficient fraction of isolates in a given population, incorporating relevant epidemiological information, may represent the most reliable strategy for comprehensive detection of novel resistance variants.…”
Section: Additional Considerations For Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, infections might be cleared even in the case of undetected resistance, and multi-drug therapy may similarly mask novel resistance to individual drugs. For example, one of the first identified cases of infection with N. gonorrhoeae with ceftriaxone resistance and intermediate azithromycin resistance in the UK was identified as NAAT-negative two weeks after treatment with ceftriaxone and azithromycin ( 14 ). Thus, while continued collection of clinical outcome data is crucial to defining the relationship between phenotypic susceptibility test results and expected treatment outcome, surveillance programs designed to regularly sample a sufficient fraction of isolates in a given population, incorporating relevant epidemiological information, may represent the most reliable strategy for comprehensive detection of novel resistance variants.…”
Section: Additional Considerations For Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the requirement of confirmatory phenotyping to identify novel resistance may not extend to pathogens that are expected to be associated with reliably-identifiable treatment failures, as for these pathogens, identification of treatment failure likely represents the most efficient method of novel resistance variant detection 61 . However, for other pathogens, such as N. gonorrhoeae 62 , treatment failures may go undetected for reasons including partial abatement of symptoms or long treatment regimens. Ultimately, as genotype-based diagnostics for antibiotic resistance become available for more species, it will be important to assess the efficiencies of these approaches across pathogens with different clinical, epidemiological, and evolutionary paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ONT data were compared with Illumina data available for the reference strains and clinical isolates, which was used as a gold standard together with published descriptions of the variants present. 10,12,13 Illumina data were processed as described previously. 14 Table 1.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details on the specific resistance variants can be found in. 10,12,13 In addition, we also tested our final algorithm on 10 nanopore metagenomic sequences from N. gonorrhoeae positive urine samples obtained from men with symptomatic urethral gonorrhoea, described previously. 2 Cultured isolates from the same infections were sequenced with an Illumina MiniSeq, following the manufacturer's instructions, to allow for comparisons.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%