2001
DOI: 10.1078/0944-5013-00100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of aster yellows phytoplasma in false flax based on PCR and RFLP

Abstract: False flax (Camelina sativa L.) plants were found to be infected with a yellows-type disease caused by a phytoplasma in experimental plots at the Edmonton Research station. Alberta, Canada. Typical phytoplasmas were detected in the phloem cells in ultrathin sections from leaf midrib tissues examined by electron microscopy. These observations were supported by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using two primer pairs, R16 F2n/R2 and R16(1)F1/R1, derived from phytoplasma rDNA sequences. Aster yellows (AY) and potat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the past decade, the application of molecular techniques has become the most reliable approach in characterizing and studying the phylogenetic relationships of phytoplasmas. Among these techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered the most sensitive method for phytoplasma identification and classification (Ahrens and Seemüller, 1992; Namba et al., 1993; Schneider et al., 1993; Gundersen et al., 1994a; Khadhair et al., 2001). Development of universal and specific primers based on conserved regions of 16S rDNA, 16S–23S rDNA, ribosomal protein and other conserved chromosomal genes or DNA sequences has facilitated the detection and classification of a number of unknown phytoplasmas by PCR assay (Deng and Hiruki, 1991; Lee et al., 1993, 1994; Gundersen et al., 1994b; Kirkpatrick et al., 1994; Leifting et al., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the past decade, the application of molecular techniques has become the most reliable approach in characterizing and studying the phylogenetic relationships of phytoplasmas. Among these techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered the most sensitive method for phytoplasma identification and classification (Ahrens and Seemüller, 1992; Namba et al., 1993; Schneider et al., 1993; Gundersen et al., 1994a; Khadhair et al., 2001). Development of universal and specific primers based on conserved regions of 16S rDNA, 16S–23S rDNA, ribosomal protein and other conserved chromosomal genes or DNA sequences has facilitated the detection and classification of a number of unknown phytoplasmas by PCR assay (Deng and Hiruki, 1991; Lee et al., 1993, 1994; Gundersen et al., 1994b; Kirkpatrick et al., 1994; Leifting et al., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Phytoplasmas * Camelina sativa plants in experimental plots in Alberta, Canada, were found to be infected by the aster yellows phytoplasma disease (Khadhair et al 2001). …”
Section: Response To Other Human Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). This primer pair has been used previously to amplify the partial 16S RNA gene of a number of phytoplasmas from various groups (Khadhair et al., 2001, 2002, 2003; Lee et al., 1998; Gundersen and Lee, 1996; Kirkpatrick et al., 1994). The other primer pair P3 / P7 produced the expected PCR products of 320 bp for all of the tested samples (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%