2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0298-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of critical cerebral desaturation thresholds by three regional oximeters during hypoxia: a pilot study in healthy volunteers

Abstract: BackgroundRegional oximetry is increasingly used to monitor post-extraction oxygen status of the brain during surgical procedures where hemodynamic fluctuations are expected. Particularly in cardiac surgery, clinicians employ an interventional algorithm to restore baseline regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) when a patient reaches a critical desaturation threshold. Evidence suggests that monitoring cardiac surgery patients and intervening to maintain rSO2 can improve postoperative outcomes; however, evidence gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, each manufacturer's device responds differently to haemodynamic fluctuations. 32,33 Hence, study results obtained with one NIRS device might not be applicable when another NIRS device is being used, which might partially explain why the results from published studies are conflicting. Fourth, not all eligible patients were included, as there were few available NIRS devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, each manufacturer's device responds differently to haemodynamic fluctuations. 32,33 Hence, study results obtained with one NIRS device might not be applicable when another NIRS device is being used, which might partially explain why the results from published studies are conflicting. Fourth, not all eligible patients were included, as there were few available NIRS devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For direct comparisons of NIRS tissue oximeter models, caution is advised in interpreting the results when no comparative co-oximetry blood oxygen saturation reference (such as REF CX) is used as a control. One cannot determine which monitor is more accurate or has the more appropriate StO 2 value or rate of change [ 116 ] during an hypoxic or ischemia event without an appropriate comparative reference. Likewise, caution is advised in interpreting comparisons of different NIRS tissue oximeter models to blood oxygen saturation references different from that of the original NIRS tissue oximeter’s validation reference such as cerebral StO2 vs central or mixed venous SvO 2 [ 117 119 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing of age (months) and different sensors might be the reasons for the diversity of their results compared with our study. There are many commercially available NIRS devices on the market, and numerous studies [23][24][25][26][27] have compared the differences between them. The related results showed that there were significant differences between the devices in how they respond to changes in oxygen saturation, so caution should be used when applying evidence that was generated with one manufacturer's device to all devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%