2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-014-9982-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Florfenicol Residues in Salmon Trout via GC–MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to ethyl acetate, acetonitrile was stronger polar solvent, which could extract more polar compounds, leading to more matrix interferences and ion suppression for the polar target analytes, especially amitrole . As discussed above, ethyl acetate was used for extraction of the analytes from fish samples, which has been applied for diethylstilbestrol , florfenicol , and other chemicals from fish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to ethyl acetate, acetonitrile was stronger polar solvent, which could extract more polar compounds, leading to more matrix interferences and ion suppression for the polar target analytes, especially amitrole . As discussed above, ethyl acetate was used for extraction of the analytes from fish samples, which has been applied for diethylstilbestrol , florfenicol , and other chemicals from fish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several analytical methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [7,9], high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) [3,[10][11][12][13], gas chromatography (GC) [14], and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [15] have been reported for the determination of FF and its metabolites in water, feed, and animal-derived food. On the other hand, the analysis of animal biological fuids has been less frequent, mainly involving serum [16], plasma [13,17], synovial fuid [18], and cerebrospinal fuid [19], but no study has focused on the pharmacokinetics of FF and FFA in seminal plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of amphenicol detection approaches have been extensively developed by immunosorbent assay [ 11 , 12 ], fluorescence sensors [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], electrochemical sensors [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], and high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS), etc. [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%