2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001340101010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients

Abstract: In mechanically ventilated patients, flow limitation can well be detected by the resistance-, NEP-, and interrupter methods. However, the NEP method can overestimate the flow limited portion, while the resistance method can underestimate the flow limited portion. The interrupter method is found to be less practical.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a review of the literature in this area suggests some alternative mechanisms through which paradoxic responses could occur (30). The waterfall theory is based on a onecompartment model, which is useful to explain some clinical observations but overly simplistic for explaining phenomena such as those observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a review of the literature in this area suggests some alternative mechanisms through which paradoxic responses could occur (30). The waterfall theory is based on a onecompartment model, which is useful to explain some clinical observations but overly simplistic for explaining phenomena such as those observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10 Figure 4 shows the isovolume pressure-flow (IVPF) curves for cases 8 and 10 at a lung volume 0.3 l above the lung volume reached at the end of control expiration. These curves were obtained by reproducing a technique proposed by Lourens et al, 24,25 which places an adjustable resistor in the expiratory line of the ventilatory circuit. Briefly, a set of increasing levels of resistance were added to the outlet of the ventilator expiratory channel to obtain a corresponding set of test expirations with different driving pressures (alveolar minus tracheal pressure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are based on applying a negative expiratory pressure at the patient's mouth or modifying the resistance of the expiratory circuit during a test expiration. 24,39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4 This finding probably spurred a long line of investigations into the work of breathing (WOB) with CPAP systems, demand flow systems, and modern ventilators. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Both groups described improvements in patient comfort, manifest by reductions in dyspnea and respiratory rate. Neither, however, attributed the comfort to patient-device interaction.…”
Section: Patient-ventilator Interaction During Continuous Positive-prmentioning
confidence: 98%