2000
DOI: 10.1007/s100380070028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of genetic variation in Indian population groups using a novel minisatellite probe and finding relationships through tree construction

Abstract: Genetic variation in HaeIII-digested genomic DNA samples from different individuals belonging to population groups from Bengal, Uttar Pradesh (UP), Punjab, and South India was assessed at hypervariable loci, using a minisatellite probe, pBA1.2 (accession number, AF 157691), the repeat unit of which was 24 mer long and rich in G-bases. Comparison of DNA profiles between individuals showed a very low probability of band sharing, which ranged from 0.18 to 0.24. A dendrogram, based on Nei's genetic distance, const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by prehistoric, historic, and linguistic evidences where Middle East/West Asian and Central Asian gene pools have been known to have contributed to the Indian gene pool (Majumder 2001). The calculated diversity for both biallelic markers and Y-STRs strengthened the inference of a strong admixture in Indian populations reported earlier (Saha et al 2003;Saha and Bamezai 2000) and supported by median joining network (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This is supported by prehistoric, historic, and linguistic evidences where Middle East/West Asian and Central Asian gene pools have been known to have contributed to the Indian gene pool (Majumder 2001). The calculated diversity for both biallelic markers and Y-STRs strengthened the inference of a strong admixture in Indian populations reported earlier (Saha et al 2003;Saha and Bamezai 2000) and supported by median joining network (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A perusal of above given facts makes it possible to conclude, that Khatri population is most probably a result of conglomeration of different lineages like most other North-West Indian populations (Majumder 2001;Saha et al 2003;Saha and Bamezai 2000). The results of this study can only be reinforced by further study with larger sample size as well as more DNA markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%