1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00118-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharide by means of an immunolimulus assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted, however, that the tandem repeats of the nucleotide tetramer CAAT which are present in the 5Ј region of the H. influenzae type b lex-1/lic2A gene (12,27) and which are involved in LOS phase variation in H. influenzae (27) are not present in lbgA. While the absence of these nucleotide repeats in lbgA does not preclude phase variation by H. ducreyi LOS epitopes, studies from this laboratory suggest that at least the LOS epitope defined by its reactivity with MAb 3E6 does not exhibit phase variation in H. ducreyi 35000 (26). Similarly, structural analyses of purified H. ducreyi LOS indicate that phase variation of H. ducreyi LOS epitopes is minimal (37,61,62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It should be noted, however, that the tandem repeats of the nucleotide tetramer CAAT which are present in the 5Ј region of the H. influenzae type b lex-1/lic2A gene (12,27) and which are involved in LOS phase variation in H. influenzae (27) are not present in lbgA. While the absence of these nucleotide repeats in lbgA does not preclude phase variation by H. ducreyi LOS epitopes, studies from this laboratory suggest that at least the LOS epitope defined by its reactivity with MAb 3E6 does not exhibit phase variation in H. ducreyi 35000 (26). Similarly, structural analyses of purified H. ducreyi LOS indicate that phase variation of H. ducreyi LOS epitopes is minimal (37,61,62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…No differences were observed. A Western blot probed with anti-LOS monoclonal antibody 3E6 (22,69) revealed that there were no major differences in reactivity between the LOS moieties of parent and mutant strains (data not shown). There were also no differences in growth in rich broth between parent (35000HP and FX517) and mutant (FX533 and FX534) strains (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 ϫ 10 8 CFU) were suspended in Laemmli sample buffer (10% glycerol, 5% ␤ME, SDS, 0.0025% bromophenol blue) and incubated with proteinase K (50 g/ml final concentration) for 1 h at 56°C (27), boiled for 1 min, and stored at 4°C. Approximately 5 l of this preparation was subjected to SDS-PAGE and silver stained according to the method of Tsai and Frasch (76) or subjected to Western blotting with monoclonal antibody 3E6 that reacts with purified LOS from H. ducreyi strain 35000HP (22,69).…”
Section: Strains and Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct immunofluorescent testing of ulcer material using an H ducreyi-specific monoclonal antibody appears to be useful (8,9). Hansen et al (10) developed an antigen detection assay to detect H ducreyi lipooligosaccharide (LOS) using an LOSspecific monoclonal antibody and an adaptation of the limulus amoebocyte assay. The sensitivity and specificity of these antigen detection methods are 89% to 100%, and 63% to 81%, respectively (8).…”
Section: Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%