2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of heart murmurs based on radial wavelet neural network with Kalman learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, identification of S 2 (SHSD) at the event level, was reported in [25], [29], [45], [47], [52], [57], [64], [87]- [89], [92], [94], [96], [100], and [104], achieving a mean accuracy of 93.96 ± 5.01%; while the mean classification accuracy reported in [90], [106], and [111] was 90.82 ± 6.58%. Pathological heart sounds detection (PHSD) at the event level reported in [29], [64], [65], [67], and [112], achieved mean accuracy of 88.50 ± 5.93%, while pathological heart sounds classification (PHSC) reported in [64], [69], [75], [78], [95], [105], [110], [140], [142], [145], [146], [155], [157], [158], [162]- [164], [167], [170], [183], [185], and [191], achieved mean classification accuracy of 90.28 ± 7.82%. The mean accuracy in the identification of S 1 at the event level was found to be the highest.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, identification of S 2 (SHSD) at the event level, was reported in [25], [29], [45], [47], [52], [57], [64], [87]- [89], [92], [94], [96], [100], and [104], achieving a mean accuracy of 93.96 ± 5.01%; while the mean classification accuracy reported in [90], [106], and [111] was 90.82 ± 6.58%. Pathological heart sounds detection (PHSD) at the event level reported in [29], [64], [65], [67], and [112], achieved mean accuracy of 88.50 ± 5.93%, while pathological heart sounds classification (PHSC) reported in [64], [69], [75], [78], [95], [105], [110], [140], [142], [145], [146], [155], [157], [158], [162]- [164], [167], [170], [183], [185], and [191], achieved mean classification accuracy of 90.28 ± 7.82%. The mean accuracy in the identification of S 1 at the event level was found to be the highest.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitates identification and extraction of acoustic signals of interest in each cardiac cycle. Broadly, reported segmentation methods can be classified into: envelope based methods [47], [57], [58], [68], [79], [84]- [89], ECG and/or carotid pulse reference based methods [72], [90]- [99], probabilistic models [45], [52], [65], [67], [77], [80], [100]- [105], feature based methods [25], [29], [49], [61], [75], [106]- [108], time-frequency analysis based methods [55], [59], [62], [109], [110], and learning based methods [50], [111]- [113].…”
Section: B Heart Sounds Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guillermo et al [61] proposed a Radial Wavelet Neural Network (RWNN) with Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) model for heart disease classifications. CWT was used to segment PCG signal and identify primary heart sounds, S1 and S2.…”
Section: Pcg Signal Feature Extraction and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is better to decide the systole and diastole based on children's heart rate. Second, the commonly used features in previous studies include magnitude [14], frequency spectrum [10,15], normalized energy spectrum [16], power spectral density [17,18], and wavelet coefficients [19]. e differences in these features between heart murmurs and normal heart sounds in both time and frequency domains are used to differentiate heart murmurs from PCG signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%