2014
DOI: 10.1121/1.4829525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of high-frequency energy level changes in speech and singing

Abstract: Previous work has shown that human listeners are sensitive to level differences in high-frequency energy (HFE) in isolated vowel sounds produced by male singers. Results indicated that sensitivity to HFE level changes increased with overall HFE level, suggesting that listeners would be more "tuned" to HFE in vocal production exhibiting higher levels of HFE. It follows that sensitivity to HFE level changes should be higher (1) for female vocal production than for male vocal production and (2) for singing than f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first (F1) and second (F2) formants frequencies (approximately 350–2500 Hz) are known to include much of the cues necessary for speech intelligibility and vowel discrimination . Although the acoustical energy of the human voice beyond 5000 Hz may contain potentially important information , for this particular study, the frequency range of human speech was considered between 501 and 3150 Hz, largely overlapping with the first two and most critical speech formants (F1 and F2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first (F1) and second (F2) formants frequencies (approximately 350–2500 Hz) are known to include much of the cues necessary for speech intelligibility and vowel discrimination . Although the acoustical energy of the human voice beyond 5000 Hz may contain potentially important information , for this particular study, the frequency range of human speech was considered between 501 and 3150 Hz, largely overlapping with the first two and most critical speech formants (F1 and F2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to changes in facial expression, aging or wearable dental apparatuses such as braces or retainers. Although it might not be significant for listeners of normal hearing [28], this finding encourages further perceptual studies focusing on the high-frequency range for /s/ and fricatives in general as well as detailed studies on the potential impact of the baffle position and lips end termination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…of correctly detected frames of vowels No. of total frames of oral and nasalized vowels (21) For the purpose of comparison with the proposed method, we use the state-of-the-art method using MFCCs [40]. The velocity, acceleration and the energy parameters are added for both the MFCCs and MFPSCCs.…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been reported on many aspects of vowel nasalization in terms of acoustics, perception, and physiology [1,6,19,21,27,34]. Nasal pressure, nasal vibration, and nasal flow are measured by Horii by using a microphone as well as a sensing device at the nose [3,5,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%