1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb00769.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Clostridium botulinum types C and D toxin by ELISA

Abstract: An ELISA to detect Clostridium botulinum type D toxin was developed using polyclonal antibodies to a semi-purified toxic complex of the neurotoxin. Sensitivity of the ELISA for detecting type C and type D toxin compared with mouse inoculation was 70% and specificity 96% on samples from animals with botulism diagnosed on clinical signs and herd history. However, both mouse inoculation and the ELISA failed to detect toxin in many animals with a presumptive diagnosis of botulism. Some cross-reaction was seen with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…reported that the toxin was not detected via the mouse assay in some birds affected by botulism (Thomas, 1991;Neimanis et al, 2007). However, a mouse assay was used for diagnosis because of the irreversible reaction of botulinum toxin at neuromuscular junctions (Swerczek, 1980;Rossetto and Montecucco, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that the toxin was not detected via the mouse assay in some birds affected by botulism (Thomas, 1991;Neimanis et al, 2007). However, a mouse assay was used for diagnosis because of the irreversible reaction of botulinum toxin at neuromuscular junctions (Swerczek, 1980;Rossetto and Montecucco, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this reason mice inoculation test is the most reliable AYTEKİN, KAYA ATALAY test for botulism [18,19] . However negative mice inoculation test results do not eliminate the disease due to the toxin may be present at below level of threshold of detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorough validation of an ELISA for BoNT detection in different matrices is indispensable, because the extent of cross-reactivity between the antibodies used and the matrix components in an unknown sample is difficult to predict. Also when A, B, C, D, E, F, G 0.1-100 ng/mL 5 h-2 days cs, se, fo, fe Notermans et al (1978), Kozaki et al (1979), Notermans et al (1979), Lewis et al (1981), Lee and Yang (1982), Notermans et al (1982a, b), Dezfulian et al (1984), Michalik et al (1986, Thomas (1991), Doellgast et al (1993), Potter et al (1993), Doellgast et al (1994), Szílagyi et al (2000), Ferreira (2001), Ferreira et al (2001Ferreira et al ( , 2004, Poli et al (2002), Sharma et al (2006), Rajkovic et al (2012) ELISA (mAb)…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnostics Of Botulism: Conclusion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were routinely obtained within 4-6 h, a clear advancement in comparison to the MBA. However, when using polyclonal antibodies (pAb) generated against purified BoNT or BoNT complexes, the ELISAs were clearly less sensitive than the MBA with detection limits usually down to a few ng/mL (Thomas 1991;Doellgast et al 1993Doellgast et al , 1994Szílagyi et al 2000;Ferreira 2001;Ferreira et al 2004;Sharma et al 2006). Later, in a collaborative effort, sandwich ELISAs based on pAb against BoNT/A, B, E, and F have been validated and compared to the MBA, resulting in assay sensitivities of 0.1-1 ng/ mL.…”
Section: Classical Sandwich Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation