1989
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/40.11.1179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Intraspecific DNA Content Variation inZea maysL. by Flow Cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have suggested that DAPI is less affected by chromatin condensation than other DNA dyes (Shapiro, 1995). Rayburn et al (1989) observed that in maize nuclear DNA amounts obtained by flow cytometry using the dye DAPI gave similar results to nuclei stained with Schiff's reagent and analyzed by microdensitometry. Important to these findings is that the maize lines used in the study differed substantially in the amount of heterochromatin present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Other researchers have suggested that DAPI is less affected by chromatin condensation than other DNA dyes (Shapiro, 1995). Rayburn et al (1989) observed that in maize nuclear DNA amounts obtained by flow cytometry using the dye DAPI gave similar results to nuclei stained with Schiff's reagent and analyzed by microdensitometry. Important to these findings is that the maize lines used in the study differed substantially in the amount of heterochromatin present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…These reach a certain level and become stabilized during micro-evolution and gradual selection (Price et al 1980). Such interspecific variation in DNA amount is not exceptional in angiosperm species (Rayburn et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The diversity of DNA amount has often been attributed to loss or addition of highly repetitive DNA sequences rather than the AT-or GC-reach sequences in a genome (Martel et al 1997) which after a certain level got stabilized during micro-evolution and gradual selection (Price et al 1980). Such interspecific variations in DNA amount were not exceptional in angiosperm species (Laurie and Bennett 1985, Rayburn et al 1989, Tito et al 1991. Further studies on the phylogeny of the Typhonium using different DNA markers might help in understanding the evolution of these taxa and the genomic in situ hybridization might provide further clues to the evolutionary paths and the ancestry for the adaptive characteristics of the genus Typhonium.…”
Section: Nuclear Dna Analysis Genome Size and Invmentioning
confidence: 99%