2021
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of multimycotoxins in camel feed and milk samples and their comparison with the levels in cow milk

Abstract: Camel milk has been considered as an important source of nutrients and is commercialized in many countries of the world including the Middle East. This study aimed to investigate the presence of mycotoxins in camel feed and milk samples in comparison with the cow milk. Fumonisins (FUM), ochratoxin A (OTA), and zearalenone (ZEN) were detected in 14%, 39%, and 39% of the tested camel feed samples, respectively. Among the tested camel feed samples, 8.3% and 5.6% were co‐contaminated with OTA+FUM and FUM+ZEN, resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study indicates that the safety of camel milk is guaranteed in the aspect of AFM1 contamination in China. Similar results were also reported in Jordan [39], Nigeria [40], Qatar [47], and Iran [34], and the monitored samples were both within the EU permissible limit. However, another survey study from Iran states that 28.6% of camel milk contaminated with AFM1 was in excess of the maximum value specified in the EU limit [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our study indicates that the safety of camel milk is guaranteed in the aspect of AFM1 contamination in China. Similar results were also reported in Jordan [39], Nigeria [40], Qatar [47], and Iran [34], and the monitored samples were both within the EU permissible limit. However, another survey study from Iran states that 28.6% of camel milk contaminated with AFM1 was in excess of the maximum value specified in the EU limit [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although ten times less toxic than AFB 1 , AFM 1 is also classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as group 2B carcinogen, a possible carcinogen to humans (Logrieco et al, 2018). AFM 1 is the only mycotoxin that is considered in milk regulations, with tolerance limits ranging from 0.05 µg/kg by the EU, to 0.5 µg/kg by the FDA (Zeidan et al, 2022). Around 0.5−6% AFB 1 is converted to AFM 1 , and its presence in animal products is a public health hazard, especially for children and babies, since milk is a major constituent of their diets (Ceniti et al, 2021;Daou et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, food regulatory authorities around the globe have not set permissible limits for the ZEN, and DON in any milk [ 33 ]. The EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain derived a Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for ZEN of 0.25 µg/kg-bw based on a NOEL of 10 µg/kg-bw per day for estrogenic effects in female pigs with an uncertainty factor of 40 [ 2 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%