2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89715-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in laboratory-reared and naturally infected wild mosquitoes using near-infrared spectroscopy

Abstract: There is an urgent need for high throughput, affordable methods of detecting pathogens inside insect vectors to facilitate surveillance. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has shown promise to detect arbovirus and malaria in the laboratory but has not been evaluated in field conditions. Here we investigate the ability of NIRS to identify Plasmodium falciparum in Anopheles coluzzii mosquitoes. NIRS models trained on laboratory-reared mosquitoes infected with wild malaria parasites can detect the parasite in comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anopheles infection status for Plasmodium is one of the most important parameters when monitoring malaria transmission. A low accuracy of NIRS to predict the Plasmodium infection status of mosquitoes in the fresh state was observed in the present study as well as in previous studies [ 8 , 9 ]. The accuracy of NIRS to predict Plasmodium infection status was still lower after preservation of the specimens in both 80% ethanol and silica gel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Anopheles infection status for Plasmodium is one of the most important parameters when monitoring malaria transmission. A low accuracy of NIRS to predict the Plasmodium infection status of mosquitoes in the fresh state was observed in the present study as well as in previous studies [ 8 , 9 ]. The accuracy of NIRS to predict Plasmodium infection status was still lower after preservation of the specimens in both 80% ethanol and silica gel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Because the difference in NIRS prediction of infection status did not differ between the fresh state and after mosquito preservation, we assume that this lower accuracy is not due to the preservation method. That NIRS does not work well in predicting the presence or absence of Plasmodium in wild mosquitoes irrespective of whether the models were trained on laboratory or field mosquitoes could be due to multiples factors, such as larval breeding site diversity, blood meal and sugar sources and physiological and nutritional status of the mosquito [ 9 ]. Further studies are needed to better explain the influence of preservation methods on NIRS accuracy to predict mosquito species or their Plasmodium infection status since only two methods (silica gel and 80% ethanol) were used in this 2-week-long study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, NIRS correctly classified 73% of mosquitoes as infected or uninfected and differentiated between uninfected and those with either oocysts or sporozoites with a 70% accuracy. However, those models were unable to predict infection in wild-caught mosquitoes [68]. This indicates that robust NIRS models for predicting infection in wild mosquitoes need to be developed from naturally infected mosquitoes.…”
Section: Nirs Detection Of Plasmodium Parasites In Anopheles Mosquitoesmentioning
confidence: 98%