2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of protein–protein interactions in plants using bimolecular fluorescence complementation

Abstract: SummaryProtein function is often mediated via formation of stable or transient complexes. Here we report the determination of protein-protein interactions in plants using bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC). The yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) was split into two non-overlapping N-terminal (YN) and C-terminal (YC) fragments. Each fragment was cloned in-frame to a gene of interest, enabling expression of fusion proteins. To demonstrate the feasibility of BiFC in plants, two pairs of interacting prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
370
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
370
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The rbr1 mutant phenotype is likely to be compound. RBR1 can interact with components of the FIS-complex [21], but could also act upstream of the FIS Pc-G complex and together with MSI1 to directly control cell cycle progression in the female gametophyte. In analogy to its function in root stem cells, RBR1 might also be involved in specifying gamete identity [22].…”
Section: Control Of Cell Cycle Progression Before and After Fertilizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rbr1 mutant phenotype is likely to be compound. RBR1 can interact with components of the FIS-complex [21], but could also act upstream of the FIS Pc-G complex and together with MSI1 to directly control cell cycle progression in the female gametophyte. In analogy to its function in root stem cells, RBR1 might also be involved in specifying gamete identity [22].…”
Section: Control Of Cell Cycle Progression Before and After Fertilizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, an FP is separated into nonfluorescent N-terminal and C-terminal fragments that are translationally fused with the two proteins of interest (i.e., a pair of potentially interacting proteins). Upon interaction of the fusion proteins in living cells, the N-and C-terminal FP fragments are brought into close proximity resulting in reassembly of a functional fluorophore ( Figure 1A; Hu et al, 2002;Walter et al, 2004;Bracha-Drori et al, 2004). Consequently, BiFC analyses not only allow the detection of protein-protein interactions but also provide information about the subcellular localization of the observed protein complex.…”
Section: Principles Of Bifc and Potential Sources Of Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This (O) and (P) Possible orientations of the protein fusions in BiFC assays. It is important to note that the orientation can have a strong impact on the propensity of spontaneous FP reconstitution (i.e., the formation of false positive interactions; Bracha-Drori et al, 2004;Horstman et al, 2014). Hence, it is essential that, for the negative controls, exactly the same orientations are used as for the positive interaction.…”
Section: Best Practices and Recommendations Essential Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasingly popular methods for analyzing proteinprotein interactions in plants are the fluorescence complementation protocols such as the split-YFP (or bimolecular fluorescence complementation [BiFC]) and split-luciferase systems (Bracha-Drori et al, 2004;Walter et al, 2004;Fujikawa and Kato, 2007).…”
Section: Fluorescence Complementationmentioning
confidence: 99%