2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/aciiw.2019.8925190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Real-World Driving-Induced Affective State Using Physiological Signals and Multi-View Multi-Task Machine Learning

Abstract: Affective states have a critical role in driving performance and safety. They can degrade driver situation awareness and negatively impact cognitive processes, severely diminishing road safety. Therefore, detecting and assessing drivers' affective states is crucial in order to help improve the driving experience, and increase safety, comfort and well-being. Recent advances in affective computing have enabled the detection of such states. This may lead to empathic automotive user interfaces that account for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As drivers’ conditions should be detected as quickly as possible to prevent potential accidents, long signals (over 100 s) are not very helpful in detecting drivers’ stress early in actual situations. Lopez-Martinez et al [ 41 ] classified two stress levels using support vector machine (SVM) and achieved high accuracy. However, the achieved performance is 2.67% lower than that of our model based on the same length (30 s) of signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As drivers’ conditions should be detected as quickly as possible to prevent potential accidents, long signals (over 100 s) are not very helpful in detecting drivers’ stress early in actual situations. Lopez-Martinez et al [ 41 ] classified two stress levels using support vector machine (SVM) and achieved high accuracy. However, the achieved performance is 2.67% lower than that of our model based on the same length (30 s) of signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, Wang and Guo employed the supervised ensemble classifier in conjunction with an unsupervised learning classifier to detect stress in drivers' foot galvanic skin response (GSR) data. Their suggested model detected stress with an accuracy of 90.1% [25]. Moreover, the combination of autoencoders and unsupervised deep learning to categorize mental stress related to HRV is a new approach that is expected to gain traction in 2019.…”
Section: Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches in driver's stress detection for the real world and simulated driving conditions exist in the literature. Healey and Picard [16], Zhang et al [20], Chen et al [4], Haouij et al [21], Lopez-Martinez et al [22], Vargas-Lopez et al [23], and Dalmeida and Masala [24] proposed real-world driver's stress detection models using either single or fusion of different physiological signals including ECG, Heart Rate (HR), electromyogram (EMG), GSR, and RESP signals acquired from the PhysioNet realworld driving database [19]. Similarly, Lee et al [17], Bianco et al [25], and Zontone et al [26] have proposed driver's stress detection models during simulated driving conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in this area is greatly based on traditional machine learning algorithms to classify driver's stress levels. Healey and Picard [16], Zhang et al [20], Chen et al [4], Haouij et al [21], Lopez-Martinez et al [22], Vargas-Lopez et al [23], Dalmeida and Masala [24], Lee et al [17], Bianco et al [25], and Zontone et al [26] have proposed driver's stress detection models in real world and simulated driving scenarios. However, extracting the best handcrafted features from different physiological and physical data used these models is always a challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%