2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of respiratory pathogens in porcine lung tissue and lavage fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the practical significance of this finding is that future work on control of disease caused by P. multocida in pigs may require investigation of multivalent vaccines based on these bacteria rather than a monovalent vaccine. In addition, our results showed high isolation rates of S. suis , HPS , E. coli , and Bb , in accordance with recent reports from China [8, 22] and some other countries [2729]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the practical significance of this finding is that future work on control of disease caused by P. multocida in pigs may require investigation of multivalent vaccines based on these bacteria rather than a monovalent vaccine. In addition, our results showed high isolation rates of S. suis , HPS , E. coli , and Bb , in accordance with recent reports from China [8, 22] and some other countries [2729]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Based on the bacteriology of the lung and BAL samples, it is possible that some of the individual cases of actinobacillosis were complicated by secondary, concurrent infections of PM , H. parasuis and/or B. bronchiseptica . In pigs, successful isolation of pathogens associated with active pneumonia from BAL and nasal samples varies between bacterial species and, particularly for APP the frequency of isolation tends to be low [20, 37]. In the present study, distribution of APP isolates at inclusion indicated that lung sampling at necropsy was the most accurate technique to isolate this pathogen compared with BAL and nasal swab (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, necropsies were made from days 1 to 21 on five animals either removed from the study and euthanised on welfare grounds or after natural mortality. Broncho-alveolar lavage samples (BAL) [20] for bacteriology were collected from another 36 pigs (maximum of 10 animals / farm) before treatment on day −1 or 0 and again from the same animals on day 7. Nasal swabs (single nostril, approximately 10 cm deep) were collected on days 0 and 7 from all live animals that were not sampled by BAL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PCR to detect M. hyopneumoniae in lung tissue has produced variable results. Moorkamp et al (2008) suggested that lung samples are more appropriate than BALF in cases of moderate to severe EP, whereas Kurth et al (2002) found lung tissue unreliable in this context.…”
Section: Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%