1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(97)00072-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of rodent liver carcinogen genotoxicity by the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay in multiple mouse organs (liver, lung, spleen, kidney, and bone marrow)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2,4-DAT was positive in all assays, suggesting that this compound induced DNA damage and DNA repair in HepG2 cells. The positive results obtained with the comet assay agree with the in vivo study by Sasaki et al (1997). They show that 2,4-DAT at 240 mg/kg caused DNA damage in the liver and kidney 3 and 24 h after treatment; the comet tail was longer after 24 h than 3 h, suggesting that the DNA damage in these organs is time-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2,4-DAT was positive in all assays, suggesting that this compound induced DNA damage and DNA repair in HepG2 cells. The positive results obtained with the comet assay agree with the in vivo study by Sasaki et al (1997). They show that 2,4-DAT at 240 mg/kg caused DNA damage in the liver and kidney 3 and 24 h after treatment; the comet tail was longer after 24 h than 3 h, suggesting that the DNA damage in these organs is time-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On Day 7 of gestation, 4 successfully copulated females were assigned to each treatment and non-treated control group (4, 8, 12 and 24 hr). In our previous mouse Comet assays, we observed no significant differences in mean migration between vehicle control groups and corresponding untreated groups at any time for any organs [15][16][17][18]. The results enabled us to use untreated control animals as concurrent control animals.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Фенобарбитал продемонстрировал также анеугенное действие в тес-те на S. Cerevisiae (Albertini et al, 1985). В двух неза-висимых исследованиях, методом ДНК-комет была показана ДНК-повреждающая активность фенобар-битала в клетках печени in vivo (Sasaki et al, 1997;Rothfuss et al, 2010). Вышеуказанное в очередной раз обозначает важность проблемы генотоксикологических исследований -оценки органо-и тканеспецифичности действия.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified