2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0441-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Shockable Ventricular Arrhythmia using Variational Mode Decomposition

Abstract: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are shockable ventricular cardiac ailments. Detection of VT/VF is one of the important step in both automated external defibrillator (AED) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In this paper, we propose a new method for detection and classification of shockable ventricular arrhythmia (VT/VF) and non-shockable ventricular arrhythmia (normal sinus rhythm, ventricular bigeminy, ventricular ectopic beats, and ventricular escape rhyt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies that have also used the class VFVT [1] have evaluated both time domain (e.g., energy, permutation entropy) and frequency domain (e.g., renyi entropy) features. The classification is done by using a Random Forest (RF) classifier aiming to identify shockable and non-shockable ventricular arrhythmia with CUDB and MITDB databases with results of Acc = 97.23%, Sens = 96.54%, Spe = 97.97% [50]. Thirteen time-frequency and statistical features were extracted and applied to the C4.5 classifier [51], resulting in Acc = 97.02%, Sens = 90.97%, Spe = 97.86% for VFVT detection (including ventricular flutter).…”
Section: Algorithm An Nc_kn N_an Nc(%) An Nc_kn N_l2rlr(%) An Nc_kn Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies that have also used the class VFVT [1] have evaluated both time domain (e.g., energy, permutation entropy) and frequency domain (e.g., renyi entropy) features. The classification is done by using a Random Forest (RF) classifier aiming to identify shockable and non-shockable ventricular arrhythmia with CUDB and MITDB databases with results of Acc = 97.23%, Sens = 96.54%, Spe = 97.97% [50]. Thirteen time-frequency and statistical features were extracted and applied to the C4.5 classifier [51], resulting in Acc = 97.02%, Sens = 90.97%, Spe = 97.86% for VFVT detection (including ventricular flutter).…”
Section: Algorithm An Nc_kn N_an Nc(%) An Nc_kn N_l2rlr(%) An Nc_kn Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) are adaptive signal decomposition methods that decompose the signals into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) without prior knowledge and only according to the characteristics of the signal itself, which is vitally important for non-linear and non-stationary signal analysis (Wu and Huang, 2009). These signal decomposition methods have shown their capacity in various applications, such as the classification of ECG heartbeats (Rajesh and Dhuli, 2017), detection of shockable ventricular arrhythmia (Tripathy et al, 2016), and automated identification of congestive heart failure (Acharya et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the EMD and EEMD algorithms, VMD has not only a solid theoretical foundation but also good robustness to noise. It has been applied in the fields of biomedical sciences [8,9], mechanical diagnosis [10] and underwater acoustic signal processing [11]. PE is one of the most effective ways to detect the randomness and dynamic changes of time sequence based on comparison of neighboring values [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%