1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(94)90005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of sulfur mustard-induced DNA modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
42
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, attempts of using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for HETEG detection were also reported. However, the GC-MS assay failed for the poor derivation of HETEG in the presence of other bases [11]. Furthermore, there is few report of HETEG quantification by HPLC-MS approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, attempts of using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for HETEG detection were also reported. However, the GC-MS assay failed for the poor derivation of HETEG in the presence of other bases [11]. Furthermore, there is few report of HETEG quantification by HPLC-MS approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early efforts to quantify HETEG involved the use of radioactively labeled SM, such as [ 35 S]-SM, after digest and subsequent separation by HPLC, the radio-labeled HETEG was quantified by virtue of the radioactive label. By this technique, both [ 35 S]-SM and [ 14 C]-SM have been used for detection of HETEG isolated from the human blood or double-strand calf thymus DNA exposure to SM [9,11]. In this kind of procedure, the synthesis of radio-labeled agent and special precautions for proper radiochemical handling are shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The severity of lesions observed after exposure to SM has emphasized the need for an efficient pharmacological antidote against its vesicating activity. The powerful alkylating activity of SM (Ludlum et al 1994;Matijasevic et al 1996Matijasevic et al , 2001Mol et al 1993) results from its conversion, in aqueous solution, to the highly electrophilic ethylene episulfonium derivative (Wormser 1991) that can be neutralized by nucleophilic agents. Some protection against SM can be achieved by glutathione derivatives (Lindsay and Hambrook 1998;Lindsay et al 1997), cysteine esters (Wilde and Upshall 1994), and a cysteine precursor (Gross et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction with DNA leads to rapid formation of bulky monoadducts and DNA cross links (Debiak et al, 2011). The majority of DNA alkylation consists of adducts at the N7 position of guanine and N3 position of adenine, accounting for 61% and 16% of total alkylations, respectively (Ludlum et al, 1994). DNA di adducts, on the other hand, represent about 15% of SM induced DNA lesions and are formed by reaction of one SM molecule with N7 positions of two guanines in close proximity (Ludlum and Papirmeister, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%