2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142196e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the tidal deformation of WASP-103b at 3 σ with CHEOPS (Corrigendum)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, addition of new precise data can change the situation dramatically as we experienced in the TTV analysis of WASP-103 b. Before the inclusion of 10 precise light curves from Kirk et al (2021), our results were in agreement with the finding of Maciejewski et al (2018), Patra et al (2020), and most recently Barros et al (2022), which also lacks these data points, of an increase in the orbital period against the expectation of an orbital decay from this ultra short-period hot-Jupiter (P orb " 0.926 days). When the recent data were added, a negative quadratic coefficient was found.…”
Section: Discussion On Transit Timing Variationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In such cases, addition of new precise data can change the situation dramatically as we experienced in the TTV analysis of WASP-103 b. Before the inclusion of 10 precise light curves from Kirk et al (2021), our results were in agreement with the finding of Maciejewski et al (2018), Patra et al (2020), and most recently Barros et al (2022), which also lacks these data points, of an increase in the orbital period against the expectation of an orbital decay from this ultra short-period hot-Jupiter (P orb " 0.926 days). When the recent data were added, a negative quadratic coefficient was found.…”
Section: Discussion On Transit Timing Variationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They constrained the reduced tidal quality factor to be Q 1 ą p1.1 ˘0.1q ˆ10 5 with 95% confidence as a result, contradicting the previous findings and potential mass-loss expected from the nature of the planet. Most recently Barros et al (2022) also found an increase in the orbital period based on their data set extended by their own observations with CHEOPS as well as re-reduced HST and Spitzer data. However, their quadratic model is not statistically superior to the linear model.…”
Section: Wasp-103 Systemmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations