2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms

Abstract: Background: Presently, multiple options exist for conducting gene expression profiling studies in swine. In order to determine the performance of some of the existing microarrays, Affymetrix Porcine, Affymetrix Human U133+2.0, and the U.S. Pig Genome Coordination Program spotted glass oligonucleotide microarrays were compared for their reproducibility, coverage, platform independent and dependent sensitivity using fibroblast cell lines derived from control and parthenogenic porcine embryos.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to find as many genes as possible that may be function in the trait, our study related global gene expression profiles to muscle fatty acid composition. Affymetrix Porcine Genome Array was applied according to its sensitivity and reproducibility for swine genomic studies 22. Although fold changes of the selected genes were not exactly same between real-time PCR assay and microarray assay, the expression tendencies were highly consistent, suggesting that the data from microarray assay in our study was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to find as many genes as possible that may be function in the trait, our study related global gene expression profiles to muscle fatty acid composition. Affymetrix Porcine Genome Array was applied according to its sensitivity and reproducibility for swine genomic studies 22. Although fold changes of the selected genes were not exactly same between real-time PCR assay and microarray assay, the expression tendencies were highly consistent, suggesting that the data from microarray assay in our study was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Long oligonucleotide arrays are also considered to be an improvement over cDNA arrays as they eradicate the problem of clone misidentification and erroneous cross hybridisation [13]. The use of the long oligonucleotide whole genome chicken array as a tool in comparative genomics for other avian species has been validated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that probe specificity and sensitivity depend on multiple factors including uniqueness, GC content, steric hindrance, optimal melting temperature and distance from the 3′ end of the ORF (Tsai et al 2006; Hughes et al 2001; Nakaya et al 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%