2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2959532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection, Risk Assessment, and Survey of Four Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Markers in Infant Formula Powder

Abstract: A gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) method was developed to assess the infant exposure assessment from four important polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) markers in infant formula powder: benzo[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, and benzo[a]pyrene (collectively referred to as PAH4). e developed method required the addition of an isotopically labeled internal standard, sample extraction under alkali conditions, a saponification step, and a solid-phase extraction purification step. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soceanu et al measured 15 PAH compounds in baby food samples and reported that the mean level of total PAHs ranged from 2.52 ± 0.22 to 6.7 ± 0.375 µg/kg (that was higher than our outcomes) and the mean level of BaP was varied from <0.01 to 0.26 ± 0.00 µg/kg that was somewhat similar to our results (17). Cai et al measured four PAHs in infant formula powders and reported that the PAH4 level was detected to be in the variety of 0.1-0.87 µg/kg (mean level 0.4 µg/kg) that was somewhat similar to our findings, and also, the mean level of BaP was 0.021 µg/kg (varied from <0.1 to 0.09 µg/kg) that was lower than these findings (19). Ciecierska et al measured 19 PAHs in baby food samples and reported that the mean level of PAHs was varied from 0.28 ± 0.04 to 7.45 ± 0.82 µg/kg (that were higher than our findings), and the mean level of BaP was ranged from nd to 0.25 ± 0.06 µg/kg that was similar to our results (21).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pah Compounds In Baby Foods Samplessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Soceanu et al measured 15 PAH compounds in baby food samples and reported that the mean level of total PAHs ranged from 2.52 ± 0.22 to 6.7 ± 0.375 µg/kg (that was higher than our outcomes) and the mean level of BaP was varied from <0.01 to 0.26 ± 0.00 µg/kg that was somewhat similar to our results (17). Cai et al measured four PAHs in infant formula powders and reported that the PAH4 level was detected to be in the variety of 0.1-0.87 µg/kg (mean level 0.4 µg/kg) that was somewhat similar to our findings, and also, the mean level of BaP was 0.021 µg/kg (varied from <0.1 to 0.09 µg/kg) that was lower than these findings (19). Ciecierska et al measured 19 PAHs in baby food samples and reported that the mean level of PAHs was varied from 0.28 ± 0.04 to 7.45 ± 0.82 µg/kg (that were higher than our findings), and the mean level of BaP was ranged from nd to 0.25 ± 0.06 µg/kg that was similar to our results (21).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pah Compounds In Baby Foods Samplessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In similar studies in Italy, Santonicola showed that carcinogenic risk due to PAHs in milk and baby food samples based on meat/fish was a potential concern for baby health ( 22 ). In China, Cai et al ( 19 ) showed that the risk assessment for dietary exposure to contamination of PAHs due to the ingestion of foreign and domestic powders of infant formula presented low-risk levels for consumption ( 19 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, PAHs contamination is very common in fat-rich foods such as meat, oil, fish (e.g., salmon), and in infant formula powder, etc. (Ahmad Kamal et al, 2018;Cai et al, 2020;Lee, Suh et al, 2019;Viegas et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fats and Oilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPE columns used for purification include Florisil, EUPAH SPE (styrene-divinylbenzene polymer), n -propyl ethylenediamine (PSA), SDB (styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer), silica, aminopropyl, C 18 SPE columns, and others [ 8 , 9 , 11 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Usually, the columns alone were used for PAHs purification after liquid solvent extraction, but there are also combinations using GPC and SPE clean-up for cleaning impurities before analysis of vegetable oil samples [ 22 ], or other clean-up combinations of PRS (propylsulphonic acid) SPE and silica cartridge for beef meat [ 23 ], C 18 and PSA for dry fermented sausage [ 24 ], animal-based smoked foods [ 25 ], salmon, shrimps and other samples [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%