E VEN IF a selected cleaning system were comprised of single-component soil, substrate, and detergent solution, and all were essentially pure, the system it. far from &dquo;simple.&dquo; Interactions between substrate and soil, substrate and detergent solution, soil and detergent solution, and of the three phases [36,77] occur, and are difficult to measure. It is understandable why many investigators have attempter measurements in the absence of substrate, but lacking substrate the system is incomplete, and for such a dynamic system as a cleansing operation leaves much to be desired. The present discussion is concerned more with the mechanisms involved in maintaining soil in suspension (preventing deposition or redeposition) in detergent solutions than in soil removal from the substrate.Soil-Detergent Solution Systema Previous discussion of suspending action by detergent solutions has related the ability of detergent systems to prevent the sedimentation of soil particles. Reich [46] ] rightly distinguishes between specific sedimentation (or suspending value), which has relatively little to do with soil redeposition on a substrate; protective action, which prevents particles from adhering to the substrate; and an actual dispersion or redeposition preventive mechanism, operative in dynamic systems where the soil is deflocculated and the particles have lowercd mutual at-' traction. However, it seems certain that even though previous investigators have indirectly utilised the sedimentation technique, this has not been in a specific sense, but as a relative measure of differences in a static (versus a dynamic ) system. Preferential sorption of ions of the suspending agent increases the particle charge or zeta potential, resulting in deflocculation of aggregates of primary particles. This deflocculating effect may be of relatively lesser importance when compared with the mechanical forces involved in the cleaning operation [46], but nevertheless is effective in preventing soil redeposition. '