2005
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3871-04.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Action Potential Propagation in Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Axons

Abstract: Axons have traditionally been viewed as highly faithful transmitters of action potentials. Recently, however, experimental evidence has accumulated to support the idea that under some circumstances axonal propagation may fail. Cerebellar Purkinje neurons fire highfrequency simple spikes, as well as bursts of spikes in response to climbing fiber activation (the "complex spike"). Here we have visualized the axon of individual Purkinje cells to directly investigate the relationship between somatic spikes and axon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
185
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
17
185
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CF input produces a pause in simple spike activity, which could be impacted both by the EtOHinduced decrease in CS area that is shown here and by the increase in CF bursts that was demonstrated previously by Rogers et al (1980Rogers et al ( , 1986. Moreover, not all individual spikelets in the CS are propagated down the PN axon (Khaliq and Raman, 2005;Monsivais et al, 2005). On average, only two spikes, corresponding to the fast Na ϩ spike and a late spikelet occurring at an interspike interval Ͼ4 ms, are propagated to deep cerebellar nuclei (Monsivais et al, 2005).…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…CF input produces a pause in simple spike activity, which could be impacted both by the EtOHinduced decrease in CS area that is shown here and by the increase in CF bursts that was demonstrated previously by Rogers et al (1980Rogers et al ( , 1986. Moreover, not all individual spikelets in the CS are propagated down the PN axon (Khaliq and Raman, 2005;Monsivais et al, 2005). On average, only two spikes, corresponding to the fast Na ϩ spike and a late spikelet occurring at an interspike interval Ͼ4 ms, are propagated to deep cerebellar nuclei (Monsivais et al, 2005).…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Innervation of single DCN neurons by multiple Purkinje neurons is likely crucial for the alterations reported here to be consequential for the DCN firing given that, in individual neurons, axonal propagation of action potentials, particularly of spikelets, which are more often of stout stature, is unreliable at the high frequencies attained within complex spikes (Khaliq and Raman, 2005;Monsivais et al, 2005). Intriguingly, Kv3.3 channels thus far appear not to be enriched at nodes of Ranvier, in contrast to Kv3.1 (Chang et al, 2007), offering a potential explanation for the conduction failures and suggesting this is not the subcellular locus of Kv3.3 function.…”
Section: Perturbed Complex Spikes: Potential Impact On Deep Nuclear Nmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This pause persists even when the strength of olivary stimulation is adjusted so that it does not evoke a CS from the cell from which SSs are recorded (Bloedel and Roberts, 1971). Consequently, the CS-associated pause in SSs cannot be attributed to a membrane property of the Purkinje cell (Monsivais et al, 2005). More likely, it reflects the action of climbing fibers on one or more classes of cerebellar interneurons.…”
Section: Antiphasic Behavior Of Css and Sssmentioning
confidence: 99%