2011
DOI: 10.5191/jiaee.2011.18301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties and Chemical Fertilizers in Mozambique

Abstract: In Mozambique, adoption of improved maize seed and chemical fertilizers is still limited. This study assessed farmers' attitudes towards hybrid maize SC513, Nitrogenous (N) Phosphorous (P) Potassium (K), (NPK 12-24-12) and urea fertilizers in highlands and lowlands of the Manica District. The study determined the influence of farmers' characteristics, attitudes, sources of information, and agro-ecological conditions on adoption of these technologies during 1995 through 2005. A questionnaire was administered du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is crucial to identify which source of information is appropriate in technology adoption, since the role of information is a key area in which public policy can play a significant role (Lee, 2005). Cavane and Donovan (2011) in Mozambique found that farmers who learned from extension workers were more likely to adopt fertilizer than those who learned from neighbors. Krishnan and Patnam (2012) in Ethiopia found that learning from extension workers did not affect farmers' adoption of improved seeds and fertilizer, but learning from neighbors was a powerful force for adoption.…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is crucial to identify which source of information is appropriate in technology adoption, since the role of information is a key area in which public policy can play a significant role (Lee, 2005). Cavane and Donovan (2011) in Mozambique found that farmers who learned from extension workers were more likely to adopt fertilizer than those who learned from neighbors. Krishnan and Patnam (2012) in Ethiopia found that learning from extension workers did not affect farmers' adoption of improved seeds and fertilizer, but learning from neighbors was a powerful force for adoption.…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have focused on on-farm level experiments whilst some have focused on farm-level economics (Grabowski and Kerr, 2013) and determinants of adoption (Nkala et al, 2011). In addition, other studies in Mozambique have explored adoption of chemical fertiliser and new maize varieties using sociopsychological constructs (Cavane and Donovan, 2011) and explored adoption of new crop varieties through social networks (Bandiera and Rasul, 2008) whilst others have used more conventional approaches (i.e. using farm level/household characteristics) to assess agriculture technology adoption (Uaiene et al, 2009;Benson et al, 2012) or further econometric approaches used to examine the impact of adoption of various improved agricultural technologies on household income in Mozambique Darnhofer, 2011).…”
Section: Area With Less Than 30% Cover Is Not Considered As Ca (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bara is one of the (Hosmer and Lemeshow, 2000;Cavane, 2011). In regression analysis, adoption of improved potato varieties was used as a dependent variable (Y) and independent variable included characteristics of the farmers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%