2016
DOI: 10.17722/ijme.v6i2.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of CEO Compensation

Abstract: Abstract-Using a panel data analysis, the study explores the influence of size of a firm, firm-performance, Chief ExecutiveOfficer (CEO) duality and management pattern on CEO compensation. The final sample for the study comprises of a total of 300 Indian companies over a period of three years (2007-08 to 2009-10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results coincide with expectancy theory (Porter & Lawler, 1968;Garbers & Konradt, 2014;Li et al, 2013), where employee expect that their multiple job and tasks will be awarded with decent amount of reward that can provide them with contentment. The results also in line with agency theory, the job will be rewarded with sufficient financial award and the employees conduct the job with effective effort (Khanna, 2016). For that particular reasons, non-financial reward will not do do the job to increase the employee motivation to perform better in their institutions (Bonner & Sprinkle, 2002).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results coincide with expectancy theory (Porter & Lawler, 1968;Garbers & Konradt, 2014;Li et al, 2013), where employee expect that their multiple job and tasks will be awarded with decent amount of reward that can provide them with contentment. The results also in line with agency theory, the job will be rewarded with sufficient financial award and the employees conduct the job with effective effort (Khanna, 2016). For that particular reasons, non-financial reward will not do do the job to increase the employee motivation to perform better in their institutions (Bonner & Sprinkle, 2002).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Agency theory provides this study with an assumption that people are economically rational. It means that they apply minimum effort to accomplish a certain amount of output (Khanna, 2016). The highlight of this theory is that individual will minimise his or her effort unless his or her job or task will have positive contribution on his or her welfare (Bonner & Sprinkle, 2002).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of a large percentage of external shareholders will lead to tighter monitoring of the CEO'S actions and in turn result in the reduction of the CEO'S control over their compensation [31]. In agreement to this examination, it has been found a negative link exists for shareholders who own a large fraction of the organization and CEO reward equity [38]. Enhancing the ownership percentage of the external shareholder may reduce the level of other components of compensation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This analysis has a very important meaning as a comprehensive method. The study noted that the projected profitability variable with ROA positively affects executive compensation, [6], [15], [16]Return on Assets is usually used to measure the ability of bank management to obtain profit before tax generated from the average total assets of the bank concerned. The greater the ROA obtained, the greater the level of profit achieved by the bank.…”
Section: B Return On Asset (Roa)mentioning
confidence: 99%