Determinants of further training – evidence for Germany

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 5315 November 2010 ABSTRACT Determinants of Further Training: Evidence for GermanyBased on a German representative sample of employees we explore the relevance and development of further training in private sector firms. We focus on formal training and explore possible individual and job-based determinants of its incidence. We also show changes over time during a 20 year observation period from 1989 to 2008. Most hypotheses are supported by the empirical evidence. Job status and firm size are the most relevant characteristics for training participation. Furthermore, our analyses reveal a general trend of rising training rates from 1989 to 2008 indicating an increased importance in the German labor market.JEL Classification: M53

Does digital competence and occupational setting influence MOOC participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey

“…This result was consistent with the findings presented elsewhere (Castaño-Muñoz et al 2016) that showed how in Spain specifically, the unemployment rate 2 for individuals with higher education was 14 % in the first quarter of 2015 3 and double (29 %) among comparable MOOC learners. On the other hand, lack of employer support for professional development was usually associated to low level responsibility or routine jobs (Grund and Martin 2010) where there was no need for high level skills. Therefore, workers who are not supported by their employers were possibly motivated to take MOOCs in order to substitute the lack of training from their employers and to increase their chances of moving to a better job, which possibly would match better with the typically high educational level of MOOC learners.…”

Kapitał ludzki, cechy pracownika, stanowisko czy organizacja? Uwarunkowania szkoleń pracowników w świetle wyników wybranych badań

“…Warto zaznaczyć, że TKL stanowi dominującą perspektywą teoretyczną, służącą analizie rozwoju pracowników na gruncie ekonomii [Nisar, 2004;Leuven, 2005], jest również wykorzystywana w badaniach dotyczących szkoleń umiejscowionych w naukach o zarządzaniu [np. : Mainga, Hirschsohn, Shakantu, 2009;Grund, Martin, 2012] 2 .…”

Further Training for Older Workers: A Solution for an Ageing Labour Force?

“…Furthermore, small and medium sized enterprises show a below-average training level (Blundell et al 1999;Bellmann & Leber, 2008), while big enterprises are likely to show the highest participation in training (Green, 1991;Shields, 1998;Grund & Martin, 2010 (Bellmann & Leber, 2008). Furthermore, training is more likely to occur in the first half to one year of job tenure, which is consequence of increased investments in the skills required for the new job (Green, 1991).…”