1988
DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90042-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of local population size in patchy habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Above the threshold the primary consequence of habitat removal is a decrease in the area of available habitat, and below the threshold the landscape is effectively disconnected into isolated patches of habitat ). This depends not only on the size of habitat patches and their degree of isolation (Dunning et al 1992;Andren 1994), but also on the dispersal characteristics of the species utilising the patches (Fahrig and Paloheimo 1988). During this study many sightings of koalas and their signs (pellets and tree scratches) were made in isolated trees and traversing cleared land and grasslands.…”
Section: Habitat Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above the threshold the primary consequence of habitat removal is a decrease in the area of available habitat, and below the threshold the landscape is effectively disconnected into isolated patches of habitat ). This depends not only on the size of habitat patches and their degree of isolation (Dunning et al 1992;Andren 1994), but also on the dispersal characteristics of the species utilising the patches (Fahrig and Paloheimo 1988). During this study many sightings of koalas and their signs (pellets and tree scratches) were made in isolated trees and traversing cleared land and grasslands.…”
Section: Habitat Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating a wider range of habitats in the monitoring, the understanding about species' vegetation preferences will increase. As the ability to move is essential to population viability (Fahrig and Paloheimo, 1988), knowing which landscape features butterflies utilize, e.g. possible corridors, also outside semi-natural grasslands, will improve the ability for a landscapebased conservation effort (Dover and Settele 2009).…”
Section: Comparing Butterfly Distribution In Different Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves the difficult situation of four processes potentially varying at once. However, simulation and empirical studies have shown that immigration increases the size of local populations (Connor et al 1983, Rey and Strong 1983, Fahrig and Merriam 1985, Fahrig and Paloheimo 1988, Venier and Fahrig 1996, and it is frequently suggested that immigration has important effects on population density in habitat fragments. Immigration is especially important for population density in shortterm experiments of the sort reviewed by Debinski and Holt (2000) because the effect of individuals dispersing from an experimentally created matrix into habitat patches is probably strongest during the few years following habitat removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%