2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia

Abstract: Elderly patients and those with a prolonged duration of symptoms had worse outcomes following surgical intervention for AMI. A high index of suspicion with prompt diagnostic evaluation may reduce time delay prior to surgical intervention, which may lead to improved patient survival. Aggressive surgical intervention should be performed as promptly as possible in patients once the diagnosis of AMI is made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
155
2
23

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
155
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean age of AMI patients exceeds 65 years. [12] Kougias et al [13] reported a mean age of 71 years; the mean age of our AMI group was 68.43 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Mean age of AMI patients exceeds 65 years. [12] Kougias et al [13] reported a mean age of 71 years; the mean age of our AMI group was 68.43 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In Swedish autopsy studies, it is shown that real mortality rate of mesenteric ischemia can be more than 90 %, and 33 % of the patients could be diagnosed before death (8). In many studies it is reported that delays in establishing the AMI diagnosis reduce the survival chance and morbidity signifi cantly (4,6,(18)(19)(20). In accordance withthis knowledge, with its high mortality and morbidity rates, acute mesenteric ischemia needs rapid and correct diagnosis in order to begin treatment immediately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These studies either do not include MVT or their proportion is too small [10,23], and one study has not done subgroup analysis based on aetiology which is the most important prognostic factor [3] as shown by the systematic review and many other studies. The present study analyses data after dividing patients with AMI into aetiological subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%