There is some evidence that women have equal or higher pay satisfaction than similarly situated men, even though they may earn less than these men. Using Major's (1994) model of entitlement, this study examined gender dierences in pay satisfaction in two companies before and after gainsharing bonus programmes were introduced. Results indicated that women had higher pay satisfaction than men prior to the introduction of gainsharing and there was some evidence that this dierence was greater among lowerpaid employees. Women did not exhibit higher pay satisfaction after gainsharing was introduced. The potential association of gainsharing with changes in female±male pay satisfaction is discussed. Crosby (1982) coined the term`paradox of the contented female worker' to describe a phenomenon in which women tend to have equivalent or higher pay satisfaction than men, despite the fact that in many cases, women earn less than their male counterparts (Crosby, 1982;Major and Konar, 1984;Sauser and York, 1978;Steel and Lovrich, 1987). While there exists some empirical evidence that women's pay satisfaction is higher than that of men, results are not conclusive, in part because little research directly examines gender dierences in pay satisfaction. Moreover, researchers documenting this paradox have only been able to speculate about the stability, or permanence, of gender dierences in pay satisfaction. Crosby (1982) suggested that because of the intransigence of gender dierences in individuals' work and non-work experiences and psychological barriers in recognizing inequity,`nothing in the foreseeable future' would equalize the satisfaction of comparable women and men (Crosby, 1982, p. 171). Others speculate that elimination of structural inequities such as occupational segregation, or workplace interventions that encourage individuals to compare themselves with those in other occupations, would eliminate