“…Yet, while the forms of synchrony observed in vitro differ in many respects from those associated with low arousal levels in the intact brain, their underlying biophysical mechanisms share important similarities. Both in vivo [10,15,17,21,44] and in vitro [27,33,34,37,[45][46][47] experiments, as well as modeling studies [21,39,40,48,49], indicate that these forms of synchrony are not imposed by some external circuitry, global inhibition or pacemaker cells, but probably arise from the interplay of spontaneous synaptic activity, nonlinear neuronal recruitment cascades, refractoriness and network wide synaptic depression (summarized in [17]), effectively giving rise to a default activity mode, as it has been referred to [35,36] (see also [39]). Furthermore, and in full concordance with their activities in vivo [44,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], cholinergic and adrenergic agonists suppress network synchrony in cell culture and slice preparations, shifting spontaneous activity away from this 'default' mode towards desynchronized, tonic firing modes [35,36,[62][63][64][65].…”