Determinants of Sustainable Competitive Advantage Due To An It-Enabled Strategy

Nustini, Yuni

doi:10.20885/jsb.vol11.iss1.art2

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 shows the operationalization, indicators, and sources of all the constructs in proposed model. Narasimhan & Nair, 2005;Strikwerda, 2007;Wang & Hsu, 2010 ROA: Return on asset Net profit before taxes /Total assets Dehning & Stratopoulos, 2003;Narasimhan & Nair, 2005;Nustini, 2006 Dynamic capability (DC) RDI: R&D capability % increase in R&D investment Kor & Mahoney, 2005;Wang & Hsu, 2010 PDI: Production capability % increase in production investment Wang & Hsu, 2010 Social capital (SC)…”

Section: Control Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Capital and Dynamic Capability Driving Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

Ou¹,

Hsu²,

Ou³

2015

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the search for factors that drive competitive advantage, this paper develops a framework that links a firm"s capabilities and resources to its competitive advantage. The notion of governance is used as a supervisory mechanism for an organization"s sources of competitive advantage. In light of empirical advancement, this paper examines panel data of 250 high technology firms from 2001 to 2009. The findings demonstrate that the impact of dynamic capability for production on competitive advantage is positive. However, the dynamic capability for R&D does not have a significant effect. Moreover, the social capital to build network relationships with a firm"s partners emerges as essential in achieving competitive advantage. We also find that governance moderates the impact of dynamic capability and social capital on competitive advantage. The findings of this study have important management implications. Limitations of the study are considered and future research directions are identified.

show abstract

Section: Control Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Capital and Dynamic Capability Driving Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

Ou¹,

Hsu²,

Ou³

2015

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In its essence, the term innovation captures the novelty of an idea that attempts to improve organizational performance (CAMISÓN-ZORNOZA et al, 2004 (2019) suggest that it is essential to investigate the impact of external and internal factors on firm performance and sustain performance for long-term survival. Nustini, Yuni (2006) concludes that the firm must control its performance to sustain its competitive advantage. Thus, the indicators of the "competitive advantages" dimension reflect the benefits related to the achievement of value and improvement of organizational competitiveness, with respect to increased productivity and organizational performance (BRYNJOLFSSON; HITT; KIM, 2011; MÜLLER; FAY; VOM BROCKE, 2018).…”

Section: Propositionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle

Camargo

Silva

Dullius

et al. 2021

Int J Innov Educ Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agribusiness is a set of linked operations with the objective of producing, benefiting and distributing food. This sector deals with the various activities ranging from genetic improvement to the delivery of the final product. The agents, whether small or large, are inserted in at least some part of the production chain. In this context, it is noteworthy that the innovation that has been defined as a critical issue for cooperation networks. Theory has pointed out that innovation, and organizational performance, has an influence on competitive advantage. In view of this, the general objective of this study was to identify whether innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle, in the view of agents working in cooperation networks in southern Brazil. Therefore, the method proposed for the development of this study is of a qualitative nature, operationalized through in-depth interviews and non-participatory observation. Nine producers were interviewed, from four cooperation networks in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul. The results obtained show that innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage, in the perception of the producers who participated in the study.

show abstract

“…Maury (2018) stated that past performance and sustained market share influence the firms' sustainable competitive advantage (Maury, 2018). Likewise, Day et al (1997), Nustini (2006) stated that profitability is the reward from past advantages, and firms need to sustain or enhance future advantages. So, Nustini (2006) conclude that the company that can control their performance will able to maintain its competitive advantage over its rivals.…”

Section: Gaps Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ho and Mohd-Raff (2019) suggest about the essential to investigate the impact of the external and internal factors on firm performance and to sustain performance for long-term survival. Day et al (1997), Nustini (2006) stated that performance is the reward from past advantages, so maintain performance is essential to enhance future advantages. Therefore, Maury (2018) called past performance is a vital factor in the sustainable competitive advantage.…”

Section: The Effect Of Corporate Performance On Sustainable Competitimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Investigative Study on Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Manufacture Companies in Indonesia

Purwanto

2020

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research is to investigate the effect of external and internal factors on corporate performance and sustainable competitive advantage. The samples of the study are ten manufacturing companies in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and household utility sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data analysis use PLS-SEM. The result shows that corporate performance is influenced by leverage and liquidity (internal factors) significantly but is not influenced by external factors significantly as well as organizational performance doesn’t impact the sustainable competitive advantage significantly. The results of this study can be a concern for companies that corporate performance is not the ultimate goal of a business. Still, it must be followed by a sustainable competitive advantage if the company wants the return is not temporary, but sustainable. The originality of the paper is the results of this study show that the competitive advantage of an industry or company can not only rely on one factor, from external or internal environmental factors.

show abstract

Determinants of Sustainable Competitive Advantage Due To An It-Enabled Strategy

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Social Capital and Dynamic Capability Driving Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

Social Capital and Dynamic Capability Driving Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle

An Investigative Study on Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Manufacture Companies in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About