Determinants of tuberculosis transmission and treatment abandonment in Fortaleza, Brazil

Abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a public health problem, despite recent achievements in reducing incidence and mortality rates. In Brazil, these achievements were above the worldwide average, but marked by large regional heterogeneities. In Fortaleza (5th largest city in Brazil), the tuberculosis cure rate has been declining and treatment abandonment has been increasing in the past decade, despite a reduction in incidence and an increase in directly observed therapy (DOT). These trends put efforts to eliminate tuberculosis at risk. We therefore sought to determine social and programmatic determinants of tuberculosis incidence and treatment abandonment in Fortaleza.MethodsWe analyzed sociodemographic and clinical data for all new tuberculosis cases notified in the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) from Fortaleza between 2007 and 2014. We calculated incidence rates for 117 neighborhoods in Fortaleza, assessed their spatial clustering, and used spatial regression models to quantify associations between neighborhood-level covariates and incidence rates. We used hierarchical logistic regression models to evaluate how individual- and neighborhood-level covariates predicted tuberculosis treatment abandonment.ResultsThere were 12,338 new cases reported during the study period. Case rates across neighborhoods were significantly positively clustered in two low-income areas close to the city center. In an adjusted model, tuberculosis rates were significantly higher in neighborhoods with lower literacy, higher sewerage access and homicide rates, and a greater proportion of self-reported black residents. Treatment was abandoned in 1901 cases (15.4%), a rate that rose by 71% between 2007 and 2014. Abandonment was significantly associated with many individual sociodemographic and clinical factors. Notably, being recommended for DOT was protective for those who completed DOT, but associated with abandonment for those who did not.ConclusionLow socioeconomic status areas have higher tuberculosis rates, and low socioeconomic individuals have higher risk of treatment abandonment, in Fortaleza. Treatment abandonment rates are growing despite the advent of universal DOT recommendations in Brazil. Proactive social policies, and active contact tracing to find missed cases, may help reduce the tuberculosis burden in this setting.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4435-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Molecular characterization of pre-extensive drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Northeast Brazil

“…The high rate of violent crime was associated with low economic development, limited population's access to infrastructure and health services 37 . Another study, also conducted in Fortaleza, reported a concentration of TB cases in insecure regions with low socioeconomic status 38 . Other studies conducted in Brazil have also associated a low Human Development Index with TB cases 39,40 .…”

Risk factors for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among tuberculosis patients in Serbia: a case-control study

“…Moreover, the results of the Nery et al study in Brazil [ 19 ] provided evidence of a statistically significant association between the increase in cash transfer program coverage and a reduction in TB incidence rate, strongly suggesting the importance of the inclusion of TB patients in social protection programs during TB treatment. Harling G et al study [ 20 ] documented association between treatment abandonment rates and low socioeconomic status as well, consequently reducing overall effectiveness of WHO STOP TB Strategy, despite the universal directly observed treatment (DOT) coverage in Brazil.…”

Tuberculosis outbreak among high school students in Novi Pazar, Serbia 2016: a retrospective-cohort study

“…Generally, people at high risk of developing TB disease are those recently infected with TB (6-12 months after exposure), at specific age groups (highest in children < 3 years' old, adolescents, young or very old adults), and those who are immunocompromised. Our study participants were third-grade high school students, with a very low frequency of co-morbidities except asthma and chronic bronchitis, the former being known to potentially increase susceptibility to TB infection due to the associated reduced local mucous-ciliary function of the alveolar macrophages and/or the long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids [22,23].…”