2018
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of a suitable low‐dose abdominopelvic CT protocol using model‐based iterative reconstruction through cadaveric study

Abstract: Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. This cadaveric study demonstrates that MBIR reduces image noise and improves image 54 quality in abdominopelvic CT images acquired with dose reductions of up to 62%. Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no statistically significant difference in CT numbers among the 6 reconstructed image sets; the noise value of MBIR image was the lowest, followed by ASIR100%; with the decrease of ASIR weight, the noise value increased, and that of FBP image was the highest; compared with FBP image, the noise value of MBIR image was reduced by 64.03%; the trends of SNR and CNR were opposite to noise value, those of MBIR image were the highest, and those of FBP image were the lowest, of which, the CNR of MBIR image increased by 165.68% in comparison with that of FBP. MBIR has been applied in clinical practice; through the analysis of the existing literatures, MBIR can greatly reduce noise and dramatically improve image quality [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], so, we evaluated 0.625mm thin slice image quality instead of routine 5mm images (with ASIR40%) to obtain more details. In addition, it has been reported that MBIR can improve the recognition of necrotic lesions in children and is suitable for displaying the density difference of soft tissue [20].…”
Section: Objective Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no statistically significant difference in CT numbers among the 6 reconstructed image sets; the noise value of MBIR image was the lowest, followed by ASIR100%; with the decrease of ASIR weight, the noise value increased, and that of FBP image was the highest; compared with FBP image, the noise value of MBIR image was reduced by 64.03%; the trends of SNR and CNR were opposite to noise value, those of MBIR image were the highest, and those of FBP image were the lowest, of which, the CNR of MBIR image increased by 165.68% in comparison with that of FBP. MBIR has been applied in clinical practice; through the analysis of the existing literatures, MBIR can greatly reduce noise and dramatically improve image quality [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], so, we evaluated 0.625mm thin slice image quality instead of routine 5mm images (with ASIR40%) to obtain more details. In addition, it has been reported that MBIR can improve the recognition of necrotic lesions in children and is suitable for displaying the density difference of soft tissue [20].…”
Section: Objective Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one cadaver study of IR in abdominal CT has been published so far. Moloney et al 36 evaluated ASIR and MBIR in five cadavers at full dose and three low dose levels. SNR was significantly higher in MBIR image series, compared to FBP and ASIR images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-dose protocols have been studied for APCT, and reductions of 2–60% of the standard dose are possible without affecting image quality or muscle tissue measurements [27-29]; in fact, the radiation dose in nonobese patients may be as low as a standard radiography [30]. Automated analyses can also be performed, further facilitating PMA measurements [31].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%