1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00582-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in human hair by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with nitrogen–phosphorus detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LOD and LOQ were taken to be the mean value of analyte apparent concentration in the negative samples plus 3 and 10 times, respectively, the standard deviation (14). The LODs thus obtained (Table III) were similar to or even lower than those reported by other authors who used GC-MS (15)(16)(17)(18) or alternative techniques (19,20) for analysis. The precision and accuracy of the method were evaluated in terms of the coefficients of variation (C.V.) and the relative errors (from the theoretical concentration) obtained for 10 samples containing each analyte at two different concentration levels (1.0 and 10.0 ng/mg).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…LOD and LOQ were taken to be the mean value of analyte apparent concentration in the negative samples plus 3 and 10 times, respectively, the standard deviation (14). The LODs thus obtained (Table III) were similar to or even lower than those reported by other authors who used GC-MS (15)(16)(17)(18) or alternative techniques (19,20) for analysis. The precision and accuracy of the method were evaluated in terms of the coefficients of variation (C.V.) and the relative errors (from the theoretical concentration) obtained for 10 samples containing each analyte at two different concentration levels (1.0 and 10.0 ng/mg).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several washing solvents have been reported, including water (Aoki and Kuroiwa, 1983;Kajitani et al, 1989;Cassani and Spiehler, 1993;Kimura et al, 1999b), dichloromethane and water (Kintz et al, 1992b(Kintz et al, , 1995Gaillard et al, 2000;Paterson et al, 2001;Skender et al, 2002;Musshoff et al, 2002), methanol and water (Suzuki et al, 1984a(Suzuki et al, -c, 1989Moriya et al, 1992;Takayama et al, 1997Takayama et al, , 1998aTakayama et al, ,b, 1999Takayama, 1999;Hara et al, 1998;Sweeney et al, 1998;Kronstrand et al, 1998;Liu et al, 2001), ethanol and/or acetone and water (Takahashi, 1984;Takahashi et al, 1984;Kintz et al, 1992a;Rothe et al, 1997), Tween 20 and water (Scarcella et al, 1997), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and methanol/water (Nakahara et al, 1989(Nakahara et al, , 1991(Nakahara et al, , 1992(Nakahara et al, , 1993Kikura and Nakahara, 1995a,b;Kikura, 1996, 1997;Miki et al, 1997b;Koide et al, 1998;Al-Dirbashi et al, 1999a, b, 2000Cooper et al, 2000;Yamada et al, 2001;Kalasinsky et al, 2001;Nishida et al, 2002), SDS and di...…”
Section: Clean-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MA and AP have also been extracted with chloroform (Takahashi, 1984;Takahashi et al, 1984;Kajitani et al, 1989), n-pentane (Suzuki et al, 1984a,b), dichloromethane (Kintz et al, 1992b;Moriya et al, 1992), ethyl acetate (Kintz et al, 1995;Gaillard et al, 2000;Skender et al, 2002) and iso-octane (Kronstrand et al, 1998). MA and AP in the dissolution were directly detected by GC or GC/MS using a headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) technique (Koide et al, 1998;Liu et al, 2001;Musshoff et al, 2002). Miki et al (1997a,b) used sonication to increase the dissolution efficiency of hairs, and MA in the solution was directly detected by ion mobility spectrometry.…”
Section: Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several reports of studies for their determination in human hair. Analytical methods have used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (8)(9)(10)(11)(12), gas chromatography (GC) (13), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), capillary electrophoresis (25,26), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (22,(27)(28)(29). Because of its specificity and sensitivity, gas chromatography-low-resolution mass spectrometric (GC-LRMS) method with the selected ion monitoring technique was routinely employed for the determination of methamphetamine abuse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%