2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00923-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of average emission factors for vehicles on a busy road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the shift in the maximum towards larger diameters is typically accompanied with a significant decrease in the total particle number concentration, as the air mass is transported from the roadside to the background. Pirjola et al (2006), Gramotnev et al (2003), and Zhu et al (2002) showed that the total particle number concentration decreased by 35-45% while transported from the roadside to a distance of about 60-80 m from the road. Both the number concentration decrement and the increment of the location of the maximum of the particle number size distribution have been attributed to dilution process (e.g.…”
Section: Downwind Versus Upwind Nearby a Roadsidementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, the shift in the maximum towards larger diameters is typically accompanied with a significant decrease in the total particle number concentration, as the air mass is transported from the roadside to the background. Pirjola et al (2006), Gramotnev et al (2003), and Zhu et al (2002) showed that the total particle number concentration decreased by 35-45% while transported from the roadside to a distance of about 60-80 m from the road. Both the number concentration decrement and the increment of the location of the maximum of the particle number size distribution have been attributed to dilution process (e.g.…”
Section: Downwind Versus Upwind Nearby a Roadsidementioning
confidence: 98%
“…(1) tunnel measurements, 4 (2) inverse-dispersion modeling of streets 5 and street canyons, 6 and (3) mass conservation box model of open road measurements. 7 Other means of estimating the real-world emission factors include direct measurements of the tail pipe emissions either by using remote sensing techniques, such as open path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 8,9 or using on-board instruments to measure emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CL4 program is a dispersion modeling software to estimate exposures to CO from mobile sources (Benson, 1992) and has been adapted to estimate urban and near roadway concentrations of PM (Gramotnev et al, 2003;Batterman et al, 2010). The CL4 model has not been validated for dispersion of UFP and EMFAC is only equipped to generate emission factors for PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Model Estimation Of Pm 25mentioning
confidence: 99%