1993
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90077-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of buffer zones to protect seedlings of non-target plants from the effects of glyphosate spray drift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Eles também concluíram que os fatores que mais influenciaram a intensidade da deriva foram as pontas de pulverização e a velocidade do vento. Já Marrs et al (1993), avaliando a extensão de zonas de segurança para a aplicação do herbicida glifosate, recomendaram um comprimento de 20 m sem a aplicação do produto, próximo a áreas muito sensíveis.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Eles também concluíram que os fatores que mais influenciaram a intensidade da deriva foram as pontas de pulverização e a velocidade do vento. Já Marrs et al (1993), avaliando a extensão de zonas de segurança para a aplicação do herbicida glifosate, recomendaram um comprimento de 20 m sem a aplicação do produto, próximo a áreas muito sensíveis.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…For a comprehensive understanding of the influences of residual herbicides in the environment on wetland biodiversity, it is necessary to analyse additional species exposed to herbicides, as well as examining the sensitivity of the species used in the present study at different growth stages. Marrs et al (1991Marrs et al ( , 1993 investigated the sensitivity of wild plants to herbicides in order to evaluate buffering zones for conservation. Studies using plants other than the experimental plants used frequently in previous studies (crop plants, meadow grasses, Azolla spp., Lemna spp., etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate statistical analysis are used to obtain an effective concentration EC x or an effective application rate ER x (e.g. EC 25 , ER 25 , EC 50 , ER 50 ) for the most sensitive parameter(s) of interest. Also, the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) can be calculated in this test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different models can be used, for example for estimating EC x or ER x (e.g. EC 25 , ER 25 , EC 50 , ER 50 ) and its confidence limits for mortality as quantal data, logit, probit, Weibull, Spearman-Karber, trimmed Spearman-Karber methods, etc. could be appropriate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%