2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0036263
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of calibration parameters of cantilevers of arbitrary shape by finite element analysis

Abstract: The use of atomic force microscopy on nanomechanical measurements requires accurate calibration of 7 the cantilever's spring constant (k c ) and the optical lever sensitivity (OLS). The thermal method, based 8 on the cantilever's thermal fluctuations in fluid, allows estimating k c in a fast, non-invasive mode. How-9

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All experiments were performed in HEPES-buffered solution, pH 7.4. Measurements were obtained on a Bruker MultiMode 8 AFM in contact mode using a cantilever (PFQNM-LCA-CAL, Bruker) ( 57, 58 ) with a tip radius of 70 nm and a nominal spring constant of 0.1 N/m. Force-deflection curves were obtained using Nanoscope III analysis Software for each aorta at 2 different areas per aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were performed in HEPES-buffered solution, pH 7.4. Measurements were obtained on a Bruker MultiMode 8 AFM in contact mode using a cantilever (PFQNM-LCA-CAL, Bruker) ( 57, 58 ) with a tip radius of 70 nm and a nominal spring constant of 0.1 N/m. Force-deflection curves were obtained using Nanoscope III analysis Software for each aorta at 2 different areas per aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal noise method was used, 59 applying a correction factor of 0.817 for V-shaped cantilevers. 60 The spring constants determined varied between 0.01 and 0.014 N m −1 and the sensitivities ranged from 43.71 to 54.96 nm V −1 . Several independent experiments were performed using independently functionalized cantilevers and coverslips.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cantilevers were calibrated for each retract speed as the cantilever properties changed in the NiCl 2 solution. The thermal noise method was used, applying a correction factor of 0.817 for V-shaped cantilevers . The spring constants determined varied between 0.01 and 0.014 N m –1 and the sensitivities ranged from 43.71 to 54.96 nm V –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…117 For that, we used the pre-calibrated spring constant of the cantilevers and the correction factors described in Rodriguez-Ramos. 118…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%