2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-012-0837-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of combined hardening material parameters under strain controlled cyclic loading by using the genetic algorithm method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Equation (3) still illustrates the relationship between the stress and elastic strain during the plastic loading. For yield surface F 2 , the kinematic hardening evolution of the back-stress α ′ is composed of three nonlinear terms as follows [46,47]:…”
Section: Constitutive Modelling Based On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and Equation (3) still illustrates the relationship between the stress and elastic strain during the plastic loading. For yield surface F 2 , the kinematic hardening evolution of the back-stress α ′ is composed of three nonlinear terms as follows [46,47]:…”
Section: Constitutive Modelling Based On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , C 1 , C 2 , C 3 are material parameters, ε p and ε p are the plastic strain and effective plastic strain, respectively. e evolution of isotropic hardening takes the following form [46]:…”
Section: Constitutive Modelling Based On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the experimental understanding of materials increases, so has the level of sophistication and complexity of elastoplastic models, leading to increased parameter calculation requirements, as recognised by Grama et al (2015). In order to improve the calculation process of elastoplastic constitutive model parameters, various optimisation techniques have been investigated, with two main optimisation strategies identified, the gradient-based (Mahnken and Stein, 1996, Saleeb et al, 2002, Desai and Chen, 2006 and the genetic algorithm (GA) methodologies (Rahman et al, 2005, Krishna et al, 2009, Badnava et al, 2012, Agius et al, 2017a, Mahmoudi et al, 2011, Farrahi et al, 2014, Rokonuzzaman and Sakai, 2010, Khademi et al, 2015, Cermak et al, 2015, Zhao and Lee, 2002, Khutia and Dey, 2014, Franulović et al, 2009. As highlighted by Furukawa et al (2002), the disadvantage of the gradient-based approach in constitutive model parameter determination lies in the solution divergence, an issue not typically associated with GA methodologies, which are instead associated with poor solution efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the models increase their level of sophistication and complexity, the number of material parameters has increased as well. This has led to the introduction of various material parameter optimisation techniques, in order to ease/streamline the identification process and improve the accuracy of the model predictions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, the sensitivity of the strain life fatigue predictions to the model parameters requires a thorough assessment, owing to the complexity of many real-life load spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%