Advanced Solid State Lasers 2000
DOI: 10.1364/assl.2000.wc1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of energy transfer parameters in Er3+-doped and Er3+, Pr3+-codoped ZBLAN glasses

Abstract: A detailed characterization of energy level lifetimes and energy-transfer processes in Er3+-doped and Er3+, Pr3+-codoped ZBLAN bulk glasses is presented. Energy transfer upconversion parameters from the Er3+ 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 levels have been measured and are compared to energy transfer from Er3+ to a Pr3+ codopant. To assess the practicality of energy transfer a high power, diode pumped, 3 μm, Er3+, Pr3+-codoped ZBLAN fiber laser is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that this ratio held for doping densities up to almost 4 mol% doping of Er 3+ ions [34], [35], which is considerably higher than the doping densities used in our experiment (0.5 mol%). We therefore used their result for the excited state population ratio of 33% and 66% for the 4 I 13/2 and 4 I 11/2 levels' occupation, respectively.…”
Section: µM Emission Cross-sectioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…They found that this ratio held for doping densities up to almost 4 mol% doping of Er 3+ ions [34], [35], which is considerably higher than the doping densities used in our experiment (0.5 mol%). We therefore used their result for the excited state population ratio of 33% and 66% for the 4 I 13/2 and 4 I 11/2 levels' occupation, respectively.…”
Section: µM Emission Cross-sectioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…We observe that W ETU2 is a factor of approximately 2.3 smaller than W ETU1 , because energy migration with its corresponding C DD parameter is significantly slower in the second compared to the first excited state. A similar quantitative behavior was observed also in ZBLAN glass [99]. …”
Section: Upconversion Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2.3 in Chapter 2. This approach leads to the following rate equation and form for the temporal dynamics of the excited-state population density N 1 (t), respectively [99]:…”
Section: Rate-equation Model By Grantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it results in de-population of the 4 I 13/2 level, reducing the population inversion compared to the 4 I 15/2 level and therefore the maximum gain that can be achieved. In the most straightforward model, the upconversion rate is determined by a macroscopic material-dependent parameter W ETU and is proportional to the square of the population density of the Er level from which it occurs [132,133]. The upconversion rate can be represented as follows:…”
Section: Energy Transfer Between Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%