2017
DOI: 10.5505/pajes.2016.90093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of explosion, fire and toxic emission physical effect areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using the open country option the hazard distances were larger than the urban or forest option. This result was compatible with a study that used chlorine gas that examined the effect of ground roughness (rural or urban) on hazard distances [23]. As mentioned above, due to the limitation of the method, the threat zone picture was truncated at the 10 km limit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When using the open country option the hazard distances were larger than the urban or forest option. This result was compatible with a study that used chlorine gas that examined the effect of ground roughness (rural or urban) on hazard distances [23]. As mentioned above, due to the limitation of the method, the threat zone picture was truncated at the 10 km limit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The main purpose of ALOHA software is to provide emergency response by estimating of the effect distances of chemical releases (Jones et al, 2013). The software has its own library of chemicals, but is used for modeling pure substances and few mixtures (Cetinyokus, 2017). ALOHA software links direct, tank, puddle or gas piplene source models to a dispersion model to predict the effect distances of toxic clouds, flammable vapors and explosive vapor clouds.…”
Section: Modeling With Aloha Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%