2014
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201400449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of four sulfonylurea herbicides in tea by matrix solid‐phase dispersion cleanup followed by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

Abstract: Matrix solid-phase dispersion combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction has been developed as a new sample pretreatment method for the determination of four sulfonylurea herbicides (chlorsulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron-ethyl, and pyrazosulfuron) in tea by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The extraction and cleanup by matrix solid-phase dispersion was carried out by using CN-silica as dispersant and carbon nanotubes as cleanup sorbent eluted with acidifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performances of this method and previously published methods [28][29][30][31][32] for determining SUHs are shown in Supporting Information Table S4. The method gave satisfactory recoveries and similar or lower LODs and RSDs to the other methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of this method and previously published methods [28][29][30][31][32] for determining SUHs are shown in Supporting Information Table S4. The method gave satisfactory recoveries and similar or lower LODs and RSDs to the other methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction techniques used for pesticide residue analysis in plant products include dispersive solid-phase extraction (dispersive-SPE) (Anastassiades et al 2003); QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, robust, and safe) (Lehotay et al 2010a); supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) (Shizuka et al 2014); microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) (Karmakar et al 2012); matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) (Liang et al 2014); solid-phase extraction (SPE) (Sanagi et al 2013); pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (Celeiro et al 2014); solid-phase microextraction (SPME) (Dias et al 2015); and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) (Giordano et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the original QuEChERS method provided relatively weak recovery values (<70%) for sulfonylurea herbicides [7,8]. To overcome this issue, several sample preparation techniques, including solid phase extraction (SPE) using Chem Elut SPE cartridges [9] or a mini-column packed with oxidized carbon nanotubes [10], magnetic-SPE using multiwalled carbon nanotubes [11], dispersive SPE (d-SPE) using C 18 and graphitized carbon black (GCB) [12], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [13], matrix solid phase dispersion followed by DLLME [14], and stir bar sorption extraction [15], have been studied and validated. Lee et al [8] reported that a modified QuEChERS method involving C 18 cleanup after extraction with a citrate buffer provided the best recoveries for some sulfonylurea herbicides in brown rice and rice straw.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%