2019
DOI: 10.21577/1984-6835.20190121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Free Glycerol in Biodiesel Using UV-Visible Spectroscopy: a Validation Study

Abstract: Resumo: Concentrações elevadas de glicerina livre em biodiesel causam danos em motores. Pela legislação brasileira, (ANP Resolução 45/2014), o limite máximo permitido para glicerina livre em biodiesel é 0,02 % em massa. A norma ASTM D6584 estabelece que o método padrão para se determinar glicerina livre em biodiesel é cromatografia gasosa, uma técnica demorada e cara. Como alternativa, a glicerina livre pode ser quantificada, após derivatização, por espectroscopia de absorção na região do UV-Visível (410 nm). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for mixing evaluation analysis, a UV–visible spectrophotometer measured the mixture’s absorbance values as shown in Table 2 and Sections V and VI (Nogueira et al 2019 ). A Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) measured the GCMS spectrum of the M-17 mixture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for mixing evaluation analysis, a UV–visible spectrophotometer measured the mixture’s absorbance values as shown in Table 2 and Sections V and VI (Nogueira et al 2019 ). A Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) measured the GCMS spectrum of the M-17 mixture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the slow reaction rate, heating of the solutions prior to spectrophotometric measurements has been generally required. 12 Despite the acceptable quantification limit and accuracy of this method, 12 the analysis of biodiesel required liquid–liquid extraction with 50% ethanol/water solution and hexane, which has been replaced by water in other procedures 13 with comparable efficiency. Nevertheless, the precision of conventional liquid–liquid extraction might be affected especially due to errors during the isolation of the phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%