Determination of Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid in Soils by HPLC With Pre-Column Derivatization Using 1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulfonate

Islas, Gabriela Lugo; Rodríguez, José A.; Mendoza-Huízar, Luis Humberto; Moreno, Fidel Pérez; Carrillo, E. Gabriela

doi:10.1080/10826076.2013.789801

Cited by 29 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As with water and plant material analyses, FMOC‐Cl has been the most commonly used derivatizing agent in soil analyses, although indocyanine fluorescent dyes, o ‐phthalaldehyde, TFAA/TFE, HFB/TFAA, 1,2‐naphthoquinone‐4‐sulfonate, ninhydrin and ammonium sulphamate have also been used (Table ). Soil analyses had the fewest methods not requiring derivatization and all had MS detection, LC‐ICP‐MS, LC‐MS/MS and CE‐MS …”

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similar but fewer methods have been used for separation and detection of glyphosate and AMPA in soil extracts as compared with water and plant materials. For separation by HPLC, C18, C8, Aminex, –NH 2 , cation exchange and polymethacrylate resin columns have been used. HP‐5 columns, or the equivalent, have been used for GC separation.…”

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Soil analyses had the fewest methods not requiring derivatization and all had MS detection, LC-ICP-MS, 138 LC-MS/MS 7 and CE-MS. 23 Similar but fewer methods have been used for separation and detection of glyphosate and AMPA in soil extracts as compared with water and plant materials. For separation by HPLC, C18, 4,28, 39,44,83,84,92,137,143,145,147,150 C8, 143 Aminex, 148 (Table 3). 139 Most LODs with these detection methods ranged from 10 to 100 μg kg −1 , with a few at <1 μg kg −1 .…”

Section: Soilmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, plant materials and soil

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need for simple, fast, efficient and sensitive methods of analysis for glyphosate and its degradate aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in diverse matrices such as water, plant materials and soil to facilitate environmental research needed to address the continuing concerns related to increasing glyphosate use. A variety of water-based solutions have been used to extract the chemicals from different matrices. Many methods require extensive sample preparation, including derivatization and clean-up, prior to analysis by a variety of detection techniques. This review summarizes methods used during the past 15 years for analysis of glyphosate and AMPA in water, plant materials and soil. The simplest methods use aqueous extraction of glyphosate and AMPA from plant materials and soil, no derivatization, solid-phase extraction (SPE) columns for clean-up, guard columns for separation and confirmation of the analytes by mass spectrometry and quantitation using isotope-labeled internal standards. They have levels of detection (LODs) below the regulatory limits in North America. These methods are discussed in more detail in the review.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Soilmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, plant materials and soil

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4) In case of solid samples also LC-MS-MS acquisitions proved to be the optimum selections (LOQ: 500 μg/1000 g soil [68,54]). 5) All additional proposals like PTSCL, DMOSC, post column CR and NQS labeling [60,65,69,70] are of marginal importance and serve as completing data, only.…”

Section: Identification and Quantification As Various Derivativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of derivatization techniques in the analysis of glyphosate and aminomethyl-phosphonic acid by chromatography

Arkan

Molnár-Perl

2015

Microchemical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The mobile phase used was prepared by mixing acetic acid (1%) with methanol in a 60:40 ratio (v/v). The flow rate used was 1.0 mL min-1, stabilized at constant temperature 23-25°C (8).…”

Section: Metabolite Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Bacillus Megaterium Biodegradation Glycophate

Mousa¹

2019

Iraqi J. Agric. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was aimed to evaluate the Bacillus megatrium ability to growth and degradated the organophosphorus pesticides, Glyphosate. , Bacillus megaterium was isolated from Iraqi Soils and identification by morphological and biochemical tests beside a Sperber’s Medium as selectivity media. The best growth results were in (2- 60) days, had the same growth for both (5, 25) ppm on MSM. The best degradation rate ability % were in (25) ppm /60 days (70.9)%. The increasing in incubation show increasing of degradation ration% of Glyphosate via HPLC specially after 60 days , the best ration were for (25)ppm .The result is the B. megaterium used the Glyphosate as source for carbon and phosphorus and suggest could be well exploited for bioremediation of Glyphosate contaminated sites.

show abstract

Determination of Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid in Soils by HPLC With Pre-Column Derivatization Using 1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulfonate

Cited by 29 publications

References 30 publications

Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, plant materials and soil

Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, plant materials and soil

The role of derivatization techniques in the analysis of glyphosate and aminomethyl-phosphonic acid by chromatography

Bacillus Megaterium Biodegradation Glycophate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About